Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ukraine's Supreme court begins hearing final arguments (live on TV, unprecedented in the world)
Canadian Press ^ | Dec 2

Posted on 12/02/2004 2:34:23 PM PST by Truth666

The mood among the throngs of Yushchenko supporters rallying in their Independence Square tent city was celebratory, exuding confidence that the Supreme Court will annul the official results that declared Yanukovych the winner of the Nov. 21 run-off.

They waited all day for a ruling they expected Thursday, watching live broadcasts of the court sessions on televisions in the square, showing the 18 red-robed judges behind stacks of documents hearing testimony in the cramped chamber.

But the justices adjourned in the evening after beginning final arguments. They will hear more arguments Friday, then retreat for deliberations before ruling. It was unclear how long the process would take.

(Excerpt) Read more at canada.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Russia
KEYWORDS: ukraine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
Google news keeps finding more than 3000 related articles (last : 3,107), from 4500 sources.
And that's good so, because we are living the final act of the end game.
BTW, how nice that for the first time in history deliberations on election fraud accusations are being broadcasted live ? unprecedented event
1 posted on 12/02/2004 2:34:24 PM PST by Truth666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Truth666

Hint to the US Supremes....


2 posted on 12/02/2004 2:36:15 PM PST by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truth666

Will Jimmy Carter be on hand to certify the election this time?


3 posted on 12/02/2004 2:37:30 PM PST by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan

Certifyed by millions watching live on TV. Good alternative to Carter, I would say ...


4 posted on 12/02/2004 2:39:09 PM PST by Truth666 (http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Proof+that+at+least+one+of+two%22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC; MeekOneGOP

pingaroo


5 posted on 12/02/2004 2:40:22 PM PST by KOZ. (Reducing liberalism from a threat to a mere nuisance. Just like prostitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Truth666

What's that about millions watching on television?


6 posted on 12/02/2004 2:41:37 PM PST by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Truth666

are you kidding, i consider carter to be the end-all, be-all of democracy, freedom and liberty. the only one who could possibly understand the plight of the.....HAAAAAAAAA i couldnt keep a straight face.


7 posted on 12/02/2004 2:41:46 PM PST by KOZ. (Reducing liberalism from a threat to a mere nuisance. Just like prostitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

This was a fantastic idea, to let it be broadcasted live.


8 posted on 12/02/2004 2:45:48 PM PST by Truth666 (http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Proof+that+at+least+one+of+two%22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Truth666

The real question will be the remedy proposed by the ruling. Will they go with a run off or order new elections?


9 posted on 12/02/2004 2:46:12 PM PST by taxcontrol (People are entitled to their opinion - no matter how wrong it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

Like I said from the beginning, the last thing that Yuschenko wants is new elections.


10 posted on 12/02/2004 2:53:54 PM PST by Truth666 (http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Proof+that+at+least+one+of+two%22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KOZ.; PhilDragoo; LibertyRocks; Happy2BMe; devolve; Polak z Polski; Cutterjohnmhb; Lukasz; ...
bump n ping!

11 posted on 12/02/2004 2:59:51 PM PST by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP! ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: ukie

Putin is NOT against re-running the election. He's against re-running only the second round.


13 posted on 12/02/2004 3:07:42 PM PST by Truth666 (http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Proof+that+at+least+one+of+two%22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Truth666
Like I said from the beginning, the last thing that Yuschenko wants is new elections.

why do you say that? he's stated repeatedly that he wants another electioin on dec. 19th.

14 posted on 12/02/2004 3:08:28 PM PST by KOZ. (Reducing liberalism from a threat to a mere nuisance. Just like prostitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: KOZ.

What he tells the people in the square is that unless the government is dismissed they must seize themselves the power immediately


15 posted on 12/02/2004 3:12:19 PM PST by Truth666 (http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Proof+that+at+least+one+of+two%22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: ukie

they're doing the same thing they did in iraq. delaying. so they can make they're last minute deals and shred the appropriate documents. kuchma and putin are in moscow right now in meetings. why is kuchma in moscow while his country is in chaos that he started by running a fraudulant election?


17 posted on 12/02/2004 3:18:26 PM PST by KOZ. (Reducing liberalism from a threat to a mere nuisance. Just like prostitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Truth666
What he tells the people in the square is that unless the government is dismissed they must seize themselves the power immediately

good. power is being taken away from the people, now it gets taken back. he has repeatedly suggested for a dec. 19th election.

18 posted on 12/02/2004 3:19:55 PM PST by KOZ. (Reducing liberalism from a threat to a mere nuisance. Just like prostitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ukie
Because they don't think that the winner of the second round was due to fraud.
So repeating the second round would be like repeating until you get the results you want.
Starting from scratch can't be seen anymore as that, but as a gesture to prevent a civil war, avoiding the logic that you have to re-run it because there was decisive fraud in the second round.
19 posted on 12/02/2004 3:23:21 PM PST by Truth666 (http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Proof+that+at+least+one+of+two%22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson