Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: najida
Nope, :). Next question.


C'mon, now, I could swear that that's the attitude described by a lot of the women on this particular thread and in modern life in general.

What am I missing?

She say's: 'I have standards for how you must treat me and conduct yourself that are inviolate'. She says: 'My world doesn't revolve around you.'

None of which is unreasonable, BUT, I don't see how what Cogadh na Sith differs from the standard for the modern woman.
791 posted on 12/06/2004 3:52:45 PM PST by TalBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 630 | View Replies ]


To: TalBlack
OK, I think we may be arguing semantics here.... The original sentence from old bitter buckets was-- "I'm not going to do something for you in hopes you'll like me, you'll do something for me in hopes of gaining some rare approval."

I took the first sentence to mean him saying "I won't do anything for you, even to get you to like me"
And the second sentence to mean "Women will do antyhing for men to get them to like them".

Which ain't always true. Often, we couldn't give a rats patooty what ya think about us. Really.

OK, maybe most of the time.

827 posted on 12/06/2004 4:28:12 PM PST by najida (Aunt to Miss Emily Ann- Cutest Baby in the World.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 791 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson