Phil, Prince of Insufficient Light
Posted on 12/08/2004 4:39:48 AM PST by burlywood
THE Hollywood adaptation of Philip Pullman’s trilogy His Dark Materials, in which two children do battle with an evil, all-powerful church, is being rewritten to remove anti-religious overtones. Chris Weitz, the director, has horrified fans by announcing that references to the church are likely to be banished in his film. Meanwhile the “Authority”, the weak God figure, will become “any arbitrary establishment that curtails the freedom of the individual”.
The studio wants alterations because of fears of a backlash from the Christian Right in the United States. The changes are being made with the support of Pullman, who told The Times last year that he received “a large amount” for the rights.
Weitz, a rising Hollywood star who directed American Pie and About A Boy, said that the studio, Nine Line Cinema, had expressed concern that His Dark Materials’ perceived anti-religiosity might make “it an inviable project financially”.
In Pullman’s Carnegie Medal-winning books, religion is spared no indignity, with nuns turning into atheists and the church described as “wrong and bad”. The film trilogy, the first of which is expected in 2006, has already run into difficulty after Sir Tom Stoppard, the Oscar-winning playwright, was dumped from the project and his draft shelved.
Although he is not directly involved with the film, the author has had many meetings with the team and has seen a treatment, or outline, of the first of the three films.
Pullman was unavailable for comment yesterday, but his agent, Caradoc King, said that he was happy with the work so far. “Of course New Line want to make money, but Mr Weitz is a wonderful director and Philip is very supportive. You have to recognise that it is a challenge in the climate of Bush’s America,” he said.
In an interview with The Times last year, Pullman was asked whether turning his books into films would compromise his vision. “Why say yes when they come to you with large amounts of money? I can’t imagine why,” he replied, laughing.
Weitz made these controversial remarks in an interview with bridgetothestars.net, one of the many His Dark Materials fan sites. He said: “New Line is a company that makes films for economic returns. You would hardly expect them to be anything else. My job is to get the film made in such a way that the spirit of the piece is carried through to the screen and to do that I must contend with the fears of the studio.
“Needless to say, all my best efforts will be directed towards keeping the work as liberating and iconoclastic an experience as I can. But there may be some modification of terms. You will probably not hear of the church, but you will hear of the Magisterium. Those who will understand will understand.”
He said that he shared Pullman’s view that the Authority could represent any repressive establishment — political, totalitarian, fundamentalist or communist. “This gives me a certain amount of leeway in navigating the very treacherous issues that beset adapting His Dark Materials for the screen.”
Fans have reacted with outrage. Writing on the same website, one said: “Do we really dare let someone with such a stunted imagination take on our beloved trilogy? Or rather, do we dare shun the opportunity to fight someone who will sacrifice content for net profit?”
In the interview, Weitz said that the daemons would be “largely filmed with animals” and he was hoping filming would take place in Worcester College, Oxford, East Anglia and possibly Iceland. He insisted that he was not tempted to “dumb it down”.
The books have already been turned into a highly successful two-part production at the National Theatre.
You might be interested in this...I know how much you loathe Pullman.
}:-)4
So . . .What/Who, is the 'Superior Authority' in this film?
OOooh!! Spine-tingling!
in plainspeak: the revived Christian voice will boycott the film and it will be box office poison
Then there are those who undertake limb amputations and other mutilations.
What makes Hollywood think any of this stuff is of interest to the general audience?
Hollywierd has finally realized that you don't need contraversy to sell a movie. Sounds like good news to me.
Yes the stupid unwashed masses are to stupid to understand the anti-God premise of the movie.
Well maybe the stupid unwashed masses will NOT go to see the movie.
... its about ACLU?
Actually, by that definition I suppose it could be about the Highway code (do you call it that in the States?). The law about driving on the right is arbitrary and curtails the freedom of the individual. It's also highly necessary, of course
I'd like to know, were these books big hits in the first place? "The Last Temptation of Christ" bombed in America and this was years and years before anyone had heard of George Bush or the change in attitude in George Bush's America. The US is a religious country with a small market for anti-religious movies. Why make a watered-down version of a book, when the book was idiotic to begin with? Or why not change the all-powerful church to Islam?
Phil, Prince of Insufficient Light
This isn't the stuff you read in your teenage years.
It sounds as if the plan is to pull a pretty thin little fig leaf over the anticlericalism and see if they can get away with it.
My take on the books is that the quality of writing is uneven, but the subjects are refreshingly ambitious for kid's books. Overall, I thought they were good books.
You mean, like they're not making books like the Illuminatus Trilogy anymore?
Why does everyone here seem to think that books are specifically anti-Christian? I am more inclined to equate the "magisterium" with fundamentalist Islam. The character Serafina Pekkala even alludes to the parallel between the practice of separating children and their "daemons" and the barbaric practice of genital mutilation.
Jerry Bruckheimer? ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.