Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Foolish Fears / The Big Lie coming up on 20/20 with John Stossel
ABC TV - 20/20 ^ | Dec. 10, 2004 | Michael Crighton with John Stossel

Posted on 12/10/2004 7:11:27 PM PST by FreedomPoster

Best-selling author Michael Crichton says environmentalists and the media are alarmists when it comes to global warming.

So often what you think you know may not be so. And it's a reason I love the book just out from America's top-selling thriller writer, Michael Crichton. He's the man who created the popular TV medical drama "ER," wrote "Jurassic Park," which ranks among the top 10 grossing films of all time, and much more.

Crichton's books and movies have grossed more than $4 billion. Now, he's tackling global warming in his latest techno-thriller, "State of Fear."

Crichton is an extraordinarily bright man. He paid his way through Harvard Medical School writing his thrillers. He told "20/20" he based "E.R." on what he witnessed as a med student at Harvard. "It was just experiences that I had had in the emergency room," Crichton said.

He says Anthony Edwards' and Noah Wiley's characters on "E.R." are based on him, describing them as "a little fumbling, not sure of themselves — nice people."

When he wrote "The Andromeda Strain," the story of an organism from outer space that threatens to wipe out mankind, Hollywood came calling, and his medical career was over.

Ideas Ahead of Their Time

Thirty-five years later he is still meticulously melding fiction with cutting-edge science, which continues to open him up to criticism.

He was called anti-science when he wrote about the perils of manipulating DNA for cloning in "Jurassic Park." After writing "Disclosure," the story of a man who is sexually harassed by his female boss, he was labeled a sexist. But he was also prescient. At the time of "Jurassic Park," few people talked about cloning. Now it's often in the headlines. And sexual harassment of both women and men has been featured in newsmagazines.

Will he be similarly ahead of his time with his new book? "State of Fear" expresses skepticism of the claim that global warming is real and imminent.

The controversy the book is bound to stir up almost kept Crichton from writing the book. "I'm 62 years old. I've had a good life. I'm happy and I'm enjoying myself," he said. "I don't need any of the flak that would come from doing a book like this.

Environmentalists Fomenting False Fears?

He spent three years researching "State of Fear." It's a thriller with footnotes, graphs and scientific references. In it he argues that the threat of global warming has been exaggerated by environmentalists.

"I'm saying that environmental organizations are fomenting false fears in order to promote agendas and raise money," he said.

In "State of Fear," environmental groups set off terrorist acts to focus attention on global warming.

Crichton agrees the Earth is getting warmer. But he says there is little to worry about because the climate is always changing and there is no evidence to determine if the changes are manmade or natural. In fact he says, climate scientists admit they can't predict what temperatures will be in 100 years.

"My view of this is that the media is like the guy going down the street with a sign that says 'The End of the World is Near,' and he picks a date and the day comes and goes, and the world doesn't end. So he doesn't stop with the sign. He goes home, makes another sign, puts a new date on it, and starts marching again. That's the way the media is," Crichton said.

He argues that researchers who study global warming often exaggerate the problem in order to get grants, often using celebrities to promote their cause.

By taking on global warming, Crichton hopes to ease some people's worries.

"I don't know what it is. We seem to be very ready to think it's all coming to an end. At least take in the possibility that actually everything might be going to be OK," he said.

In response to the use of its public service announcement in this "20/20's" segment, the Union of Concerned Scientists sent the following statement:

We hope Michael Crichton fans enjoy his new science-fiction thriller, while keeping in mind there is a very strong consensus among the vast majority of climate scientists that global warming is under way and human activity is a primary cause. Every time we drive a car, use electricity from coal-fired power plants, or heat our homes with oil or natural gas, we release carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases into the air.

Technologies exist today that can cut emissions of heat-trapping gases and make a real difference in the health of our planet. These changes often have other positive benefits such as improving air quality, saving consumers money, reducing our dependence on oil, and creating new jobs and business opportunities.

Our political and business leaders have a responsibility to help move us toward a cleaner energy future. Public investments should shift away from polluting fossil fuels to support for clean renewable energy such as wind and solar power, more fuel-efficient vehicles, and more energy-efficient technologies. People from all walks of life can play a role in slowing global warming by advocating for smarter government policies, better corporate practices, and informed consumer choices.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: crichton; envirowhackos; globalwarming; michaelcrighton; stateoffeear; stossel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: FreedomPoster

The WSJ reviewed this book today and I just bought it for my brother for Christmas at Costco. It sounds great. It's amazing how the mainstream media ignores the books that don't fit their agenda. I hadn't heard anything about this book, nor about the new DeMille book that is based on the TWA 800 story.


41 posted on 12/10/2004 11:20:02 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

bump


42 posted on 12/11/2004 3:42:13 AM PST by TomB ("The terrorist wraps himself in the world's grievances to cloak his true motives." - S. Rushdie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster; headsonpikes; beyond the sea; E.G.C.; Military family member; Wolverine; ...
"My view of this is that the media is like the guy going down the street with a sign that says 'The End of the World is Near,' and he picks a date and the day comes and goes, and the world doesn't end. So he doesn't stop with the sign. He goes home, makes another sign, puts a new date on it, and starts marching again. That's the way the media is," Crichton said.

He argues that researchers who study global warming often exaggerate the problem in order to get grants, often using celebrities to promote their cause.

Why Broadcast Journalism is
Unnecessary and Illegitimate

43 posted on 12/11/2004 4:33:39 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Media bias bump.


44 posted on 12/11/2004 5:02:24 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

re:"It would probably be more accurate to state that


"A Grand concensus among scientists, who receive their salaries from organizations funded by Global Warming grants, agree that global warming is a real danger.""

Bingo! I think you've hit the nail on the head. After all, how many world governments would fund a project set up to discover that "maybe nothing's wrong"? They have to keep the crisis alive, or they lose their income.



45 posted on 12/11/2004 1:05:57 PM PST by mamapajamas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: randog
And thanks for the stimulating round of "I-know-something-you-don't-neener-neener-neener". It's not often I get to stoop to the level of a teenager.

Glad to be of service.

46 posted on 12/11/2004 2:10:23 PM PST by delacoert (imperat animus corpori, et paretur statim: imperat animus sibi, et resistitur. -AUGUSTINI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: mamapajamas
Actually, even Crighton admits that Global Warming is a real phenomenon. He just points out that in his view there is no hard proof that it is not a natural phenomenon. Most of the research conducted in this area is necessary if we are going to understand future environmental trends on the planet. Considering the huge number of environmental changes that have occurred in the recent past it would be foolish to not research this area. Most evidence points that past Ice ages and world wide heat waves occurred very quickly (in a matter of just a few years or months). One thing is certain the earths climate changes continually over time, and research into that change will be the only thing that saves all of mankind when the next big change occurs (whether it be in 15,000 years or in 2006).
I'm sure Mr. Crighton's latest work of fiction is a fun ride as I have enjoyed most of his other books, and I can't wait to read it. The point of the book from the excerpt I've read seems to be that he finds Scientific claims of man made global warming to be flawed, and that he blames Pseudoscience for creating hysteria which can lead to environmental extremist movements and left wing terrorism. My two issues with this line of reasoning is that as Mr. Crighton has been a leading champion of biogenetics, quantum physics, string theory, and nanotechnology he has embraced many ideas which had previously been considered pseudoscience. One would think from his work that he supports the idea of pure research. Indeed in his last book "Prey" he took the position that it was necessary to allow science to freely explore such area because no one can never predict what benefits will be derived from any research. One is just as likely to find the cure for cancer by studying bat guano as they are by studying embryonic cells. My second objection is that the danger to the future of our society is from extremists and extremism not what they choose to be extreme about. Someone is just as likely to blow up a building because they are a right-wing militia-loving gun nut as if they were a left-wing tree hugging environut. The danger we face is by not making efforts through education to have civil discourse on the real issues of our time, and instead getting our information from entertainment driven media such as the latest Michael Crighton book or pseudo-news programs such as Crossfire, Rush Limbaugh, Al Franken, and Hannity and Combs. Talk about creating extremists!
47 posted on 12/20/2004 4:51:32 AM PST by Playdoh7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Playdoh7; Admin Moderator

Potential troll alert.


48 posted on 12/20/2004 4:55:44 AM PST by LanPB01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
We hope Michael Crichton fans enjoy his new science-fiction thriller, while keeping in mind there is a very strong consensus among the vast majority of climate scientists that global warming is under way and human activity is a primary cause.

This is simply NOT TRUE. If there is any consensus, it is the opposite. The fact is, climate scientists do not even agree that there is warming and the majority reject the concept that warming could be caused by human activity. See the Oregon Petition

49 posted on 12/20/2004 5:10:02 AM PST by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson