"People who would be appropriate to review the paper would be evolutionary biologists, and I doubt that any evolutionary biologists reviewed the paper."
I guess I wasn't watching the first time this came around. Must have been during the election campaign. Leave it to creationists to misrepresent the status of publications, and quote them again and again after they have been repudiated. The Meyer article is and always will be peer reviewed. It's an article of faith.
I eagerly await the names of the three expered who decided it was worthy of publication.