Soros Alert: Is the CIA on Our Side? (My Title)

Defense & Foreign Affairs Daily | June 30, 2003 | Gregory R. Copley

[F.J. Mitchell]

It's a beginning.

[SunkenCiv]

personally, I have some doubts about this, but... Ping!

[joesnuffy]

The agent men see the judges and legislators taking their piece out of the constitution...so why shouldn't they....

imo

[FairOpinion]

Thanks for posting this and SC, thanks for the ping. I would have hated to miss this.

I think this is more true, than we wish it to be.

Goss & Condi pretty much should fire everyone and hire a few good ones back.

It's time to get a CIA and State Dept, which work for the US, not against it.

This is consistent with the occasional snippets we hear, which get leaked from the CIA and State Department, with the purpose of embarrassing and even harming the US and they were willing to hurt the entire country, to keep Bush from getting re-elected. This kind of treasonous behavior used to get the death penalty.

[FairOpinion]

Not about Ukraine, but I thought you'd be interested in this.

[nopardons]

bttt

[Jabba the Nutt]

I hope Bush starts cleaning out the FBI, CIA, State, EPA, etc. etc. etc. No more back-stabbing bureaucrats. Oh, he could abolish the Dept of Education instead of funding it to Ted Kennedy levels.

[SunkenCiv]

Yeah... of course, part of this may be right-hand-left-hand problems. Could also be part of disinfo. But at the very least the State Dep't has a lot of partisan rot in it. We all recall the resignations and blistering libels coming from old Carter and Clinton appointees.

[Southack]

Yes, it's treason. Active CIA Agents, acting *with* CIA authority, leaked intel assessments in an attempt to influence the 2004 Presidential election (i.e. treason).

Imperial Hubris: Why the West is Losing the War on Terror
by Michael Scheuer

[Alexander Nevsky]

An eighteen month old article with no link? Hmmm..?

I stumbled upon this article just recently while conducting some unrelated research in the Nexis database. Anyone with access to a public library can retrieve it as well.

Sorry it's 18 months old, but I can't help that. That's when the article was published. Needless to say, the information it contains has not gone stale in the meantime.

As for the lack of a link, well, that too is beyond my control. As far as I can tell, the Defense & Foreign Affairs Daily does not post its articles on the Web. However, if you want confirmation that this article really exists -- and if you don't have time to visit the public library to get it yourself via Nexis -- why don't you send a Freepmail to Darko and ask him to retrieve a copy of it for you? Judging by certain of Darko's past posts, he appears to have access to Defense & Foreign Affairs Daily.

[Alexander Nevsky]

personally, I have some doubts about this, but... Ping!

Dear SunkenCiv:

Thanks for the ping. As I pointed out to lancer in the above post, the authenticity of this article can be verified at any public library -- though unfortunately not on the World Wide Web.

[lancer]

It wasn't the age of the article, but the lack of a link that made me suspicious.

Thanks for the Darko tip. I will freepmail him.

Appreciate your response.

[Alexander Nevsky]

…and to all FReepers and lurkers who may share an interest in the above-posted article written by Gregory R. Copley in the June 30, 2003 issue of GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs Daily and titled, "Special Report: US State Dept., CIA War Against Pentagon Breaks Into the Open With Profound Impact on Strategic Policy" :

Dear Friends:

In my view, this is an extremely important article which needs to be read and discussed by anyone concerned about the machinations of George Soros.

Unfortunately, GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs Daily does not publish its articles on the Web. This thread on FreeRepublic is the only place on the Internet where people can view the entire text of this article.

For that reason, I feel obliged to address questions about the article's veracity which have been raised first by lancer on this thread and subsequently — on a different thread — by Calpernia.

I know the article is real because I retrieved it myself from the Nexis database. However, as Calpernia chides me, "We do not know you to trust you as a source."

Very well. So I must find a way to prove the article's authenticity to everyone's satisfaction here at FR. I confess that I'm not 100 percent sure how to accomplish that, but I will find a way.

In the meantime, just to let everyone know that I'm on the case, I have reproduced below — with lancer's kind permission — copies of our recent freepmail correspondence. Please stay tuned for further postings on this matter.

FRegards,
Alexander Nevsky

[Alexander Nevsky]

________________________________________________

On 12/28/2004 5:18:32 PM PST, lancer wrote:

An eighteen month old article with no link? Hmmm..?

________________________________________________

On 12/29/2004 4:15:15 AM PST, I wrote:

[snip]

As far as I can tell, the Defense & Foreign Affairs Daily does not post its articles on the Web. However, if you want confirmation that this article really exists -- and if you don't have time to visit the public library to get it yourself via Nexis -- why don't you send a Freepmail to Darko and ask him to retrieve a copy of it for you? Judging by certain of Darko's past posts, he appears to have access to Defense & Foreign Affairs Daily.

________________________________________________

On 12/29/2004 5:14:26 PM PST, lancer wrote:

It wasn't the age of the article, but the lack of a link that made me suspicious.

Thanks for the Darko tip. I will freepmail him.

Appreciate your response.

________________________________________________

Verification of article
From Alexander Nevsky | 03/23/2005 8:33:16 AM PST replied

Lancer, back in December, you raised some questions about the authenticity of an article I had posted to FreeRepublic. The article came originally from a print journal called GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs Daily, which unfortunately does not publish its articles on the Web. I had obtained a copy of the article from the Nexis database. At the time, I suggested that you freepmail Darko, who has posted articles from the same publication, and ask him to retrieve it for you. You responded, "Thanks for the Darko tip. I will freepmail him."

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1309815/posts?page=52#52

Lancer, I am just wondering if you ever followed through on this and managed to authenticate the article. The reason I ask is that another Freeper named Calpurnia [proper spelling: Calpernia] has now raised the same question about the same article, but I am at a loss to know how to satisfy her, since she does not appear willing to take any of the steps I suggested for authenticating it. Can you please tell me how things went with you and Darko?

FRegards,
Alexander Nevsky

________________________________________________

Re: Verification of article
From lancer| 03/23/2005 6:58:36 PM PST new

I took you at your word and didn't contact Darko. Sorry I can't help.

________________________________________________

Re: Verification of article
From lancer| 03/23/2005 7:04:31 PM PST new

Yikes, Nevsky! I just double-checked my sent mail and found this! I guess the memory is going. Point is that Darko never responded. (I just double-checked that, too!) Sorry for the confusion.

Re: Al-Qaida Leader Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's Bosnian Links Emerging
To Darko | 12/29/2004 5:25:33 PM PST sent

Darko,

Defense & Foreign Affairs Daily | June 30, 2003 | Gregory R. Copley

This article was posted yesterday. Any chance you have access to the original and can confirm it for me (or better yet, send a link?) Thanks, lancer

________________________________________________

Re: Verification of article
To lancer | 03/27/2005 10:42:50 AM PST sent

Okay, thanks. I appreciate your help.

FRegards