[longtermmemmory]

I do put people who make a decision not to have children due to a genetic issue (Huntington's or other genetic issue) in a different category than the whiney ME ME ME ME types.

I still say this article has an ulterior motives.

(just type in the authors name and do a search, a very pro-homo writer)

This is nothing more than to establish
childless marriage as standard practice (normal).
homosexual couples are childless
homosexual couples are standard practice (normal).

[Minuteman23]

I do put people who make a decision not to have children due to a genetic issue (Huntington's or other genetic issue) in a different category than the whiney ME ME ME ME types.

I agree. And your points about this article being a part of the homosexual agenda (especially the push to paint them as something of a "normal alternative") are excellent. I hadn't thought of that angle.