Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Aquinasfan
It's even arguable whether this is a valid natural marriage.

Heterosexual gays?

152 posted on 01/03/2005 9:26:49 AM PST by don-o (Stop Freeploading. Do the right thing and become a Monthly Donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: don-o; Aquinasfan

According to the standards of the Catholic Church, it wouldn't be a natural marriage because they intentionally not having children. People who are infertile are an exception. That's not their fault but how many people don't have kids so they can have more goodies?


161 posted on 01/03/2005 9:29:49 AM PST by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

To: don-o

No joke: It is actually marriage as envisioned by the fine leftist lawyers of the American Bar Association.

Children are not part of marriage IS thier goal. They wrote it into their model divorce code. That model divorce code is the ONLY ONE used by legislators because it is the ONLY ONE. (it also envisions child visitation standing for homosexual recreational sex partners of divorcing mothers/fathers because children are mere ACCESSORIES to marriage. per ABA)

as I said, no joke, no sacasm, very real, very here.


181 posted on 01/03/2005 9:36:58 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson