Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: adiaireton8
If X is a part of a human being, then X is not a human being. No part can be a whole of the same sort as the part. That's ontology 101.

True, a part is not the same as the whole. But, what are you referring to specifically?

33 posted on 01/11/2005 1:28:52 PM PST by beavus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: beavus; Question_Assumptions
True, a part is not the same as the whole. But, what are you referring to specifically?

Question_Assumptions said (in #25), "At no point in a person's lifecycle, from the moment they cease being a part of their respective parents and start being a distinct individual . . ."

That statement is incoherent because there is no point in a person's lifespan when he is a part of his parents. Parts are not wholes. Persons are wholes. Therefore parts are not persons.

- A8

76 posted on 01/11/2005 3:57:10 PM PST by adiaireton8 ("There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse." - Plato, Phaedo 89d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson