Skip to comments.
Ohio Supreme Court Dismisses Voter Challenge to Presidential Election
Ohio Beacon Journal ^
| January 12, 2005
Posted on 01/12/2005 10:53:16 AM PST by gopwinsin04
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-108 next last
To: mainepatsfan
"Well not 100,000. 50,000 is my limit."Damned good thing I spit that coffee on my LAP instead of the keyboard...
61
posted on
01/12/2005 12:41:12 PM PST
by
cake_crumb
(Leftist Credo: "One Wing to Rule Them all and to the Dark Side Bind Them")
To: bushisaprogressive
bushisaprogressive (I must be a dummy, dummy.)
Yup -you are a DUmmy! You forget to mention that all important issue that no one cares about EXCEPT impotent politically neutered liberals and DUmmies -- NO WMD's -the horrorrrrrrr!!!!! ROTFLMAO
62
posted on
01/12/2005 12:41:19 PM PST
by
DBeers
To: bushisaprogressive
I live in a white majority area and had to wait in line for an hour and a half.
The main reasons for the wait were, not enough voting officials to take care of they amount people that showed up, and there were a few Hmongs that could not speak any English and there were no interpreters.
For me, the wait was no big deal. I actually feel that voting should be an inconvenience. I think you get a much better voter if they have to jump through a few hoops to cast their vote.
The drive up voter registration to me was one of the worst ideas they have come up with.
I am also still waiting for my cheap gas.
To: mainepatsfan
Does anyone have any idea why that particular line would set this lunatic off as opposed to anything else posted on this subject? No -but don't argue with success ---use the force Luke...
;)
64
posted on
01/12/2005 12:44:35 PM PST
by
DBeers
To: bonfire
I live in Eugene, Oregon and I still have Bush/Cheney bumpers stickers on my pickup ~ maybe it's all the pro-gun stickers that make them hesitate about doing anything rash. :)
Besides most liberals are all blow and no go. :)
65
posted on
01/12/2005 12:47:15 PM PST
by
blackie
(Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
To: gopwinsin04
Hehehe... never before in the history man have so few expended so much with nothing to show for it!
66
posted on
01/12/2005 12:50:40 PM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
Bush wins!
For the fifth time!
67
posted on
01/12/2005 12:59:57 PM PST
by
The Teen Conservative
(Taglines really get me worked up to write something in them for nothin', y'know?)
To: gopwinsin04
The VRWC is even in control of the Ohio Supreme Court in addition to the USSC. Only 49 more to go.
68
posted on
01/12/2005 1:04:17 PM PST
by
Raycpa
(Alias, VRWC_minion,)
To: bushisaprogressive
I have never waited in long lines to vote.It may be because you need to be 18 to vote.
69
posted on
01/12/2005 1:07:04 PM PST
by
Raycpa
(Alias, VRWC_minion,)
To: bushisaprogressive
We won fair and square loser!!! Also we are a constitutional republic not a democracy either.. What is wrong with cheap gas.
70
posted on
01/12/2005 1:11:22 PM PST
by
KevinDavis
(Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
To: loudzoo
Arnbeck also withdrew Moss V Moyer. He does not say why. Nothing to do with Presidential certification.
Maybe because his primary piece of evidence was that people voted split tickets.
In the DUmmie mindset, it is impossible for someone to vote for a republican candidate and a democrat candidate on the same ballot.
Huh? So he was arguing that all split ticket ballots must be awarded to the Dem candidate.
DUmmie logic and legal prowess at its finest.
According to their "logic" that candidates at the top of the ticket must get the same number or more votes than someone of their own party lower on the ticket (never mind the fact that it may be a nonpartisan race so many voters would not know who was the D and who was the R) or else something fishy is going on, then--
Bush should have won OH by at least 64% since Senator Voinovich got that amount. Does this mean that Kerry stole 13%? /sarcasm.
And going by this ludicrous logic, there are a whole bunch of states that either Bush or Kerry "should" have won since their lower-party member candidates got more votes than they did.
71
posted on
01/12/2005 1:16:30 PM PST
by
gop_gene
To: bushisaprogressive
Already did my time in hell. But then I studied economics, and embraced conservatism. Switched from a Democrat to a Republican. Been happy ever since.
72
posted on
01/12/2005 1:16:32 PM PST
by
P.O.E.
(FReeping - even better than flossing.)
To: angkor
"The DUmmies have a new "I Believe [Kerry won]" thread, and there's another where they're visualizing counting the votes themselves. On their own."
As God as my witness - that's REALLY funny!!
Gotta love the DUmmies - they keep us entertained.
73
posted on
01/12/2005 1:18:26 PM PST
by
andyland
(You can't do that to our pledges, only WE can do that to our pledges!)
To: bushisaprogressive
"You kill 100,000 people to get cheap gas? YOU WILL BURN IN HELL!" LMAO. Actually, according to Shaw's Crisis of Islam, Arab intellectuals are frustrated that for the last 50 years the West has enabled dictators and tyrants in the Middle East, so long as they keep oil production stable. People like YOU have ignored tyranny, rape rooms, and torture chambers in exchange for the luxury of swinging down to Starbucks for a latte in your SUV. Bush is changing that. 50 Million Arabs liberated. 100,000 bathist terrorists killed. And you stand against it all, out of mere partisan hate and envy. If there is indeed a "blood for oil" faustian bargain, look to your own hands.
74
posted on
01/12/2005 1:18:38 PM PST
by
Fenris6
(3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
To: mom4melody
"I'm moving to NE OHio with a car full of W and pro-life stickers." Try this one: Pro Choice: Will Kill for Sex
75
posted on
01/12/2005 1:20:31 PM PST
by
Fenris6
(3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
To: Fenris6
"If there is indeed a 'blood for oil' faustian bargain, look to your own hands."...And the hands of his/hers/its/other-NAs overseeers at the UN
76
posted on
01/12/2005 1:53:52 PM PST
by
cake_crumb
(Leftist Credo: "One Wing to Rule Them all and to the Dark Side Bind Them")
To: gopwinsin04
There is only one thread at Du on this and it has minimum traffic. They apparently are ignoring it or too PO'ed to comment.
77
posted on
01/12/2005 2:06:12 PM PST
by
SCALEMAN
(Super Cards/Rams Fan)
To: beckysueb
Actually it was a DUmmy attempting the unwieldly acrobatics of attacking us from the RIGHT.
Rather painful to watch isn't it? Almost like watching a dog trying to eat peanut butter.
To: Fenris6
I'd want one that says, "I'm personally opposed to rape" just to see if any libs "get it," but I'm not exactly in a lib-dense area.
To: gop_gene
Yup...Specter (Rino) wong big in PA, where's PA's EC votes for W?
80
posted on
01/12/2005 2:51:03 PM PST
by
FreeperinRATcage
(I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for every thing I do. - R. A. Heinlein)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-108 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson