Debating whether or not his sources are reliable, or even exist, is irrelevant. The fact that he would publish a story such as this, a story that could have exposed a covert operation or overt operation violates every rule of responsible journalism.
Those of us who know Seymour Hersh's history of liberal bias know full well that Seymour Hersh has an agenda, and if it means jeopardizing the safety or our troops or the secrecy of such a mission. Seymour Hersh will choose his agenda every time
You bring up a good point, but the source needs to go down hard. Obviously these operational plans are classified, and a misguided inside source decided to break the law and release them "for the cause".
The Dems have shown they have no problems cracking a few eggs with the troops.
<< .... Hersh should be brought up on charges for the article he wrote. I don't care how it's explained or excused. What he did amounts to undermining our military whether it's true or not.
Debating whether or not his sources are reliable, or even exist, is irrelevant. The fact that he would publish a story such as this, a story that could have exposed a covert operation or overt operation violates every rule of responsible journalism. >>
"Journalism?"
Hersh wouldn't know what that was if it was biting his arse.
By any definition his piece is subversion and treason and the aiding and abetting of the enemy in time of war. Why are he and those of his ilk [The treasonous Cli'tons, Hazel O'Leary, Lee Wen Ho, Bill Richardson and Hanoi-John Kerry and the subversive Sandy Burgler spring immediately to mind] walking free among us?
Is there no foundation of Law left in our nation?
Who is keeping the fort?