Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How to talk to an atheist (and you must)
Townhall.com ^ | January 24, 2005 | Mike S. Adams

Posted on 01/26/2005 9:46:21 AM PST by 7thson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700701-720721-740 ... 761-773 next last
To: Stone Mountain

OK.

Except I do not advocate sanctioning the obnoxious. I advocate sanctioning gross insults, to family, dignity or religion of the locale.

Our trouble as a nation is that these laws are too federal. The local community has no trouble understanding decency, pornography, or what have you. After all, they still ban public nudity and regulate porno shop licenses. So it is doable, given the will.


701 posted on 01/27/2005 1:55:23 PM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 696 | View Replies]

To: missyme

What do any of those issues have to do with my feeling that no one has the right to force anyone else to believe what they believe?

Regarding God's views on atheism, you tell me. You're the Biblical expert.


702 posted on 01/27/2005 1:56:52 PM PST by SilentServiceCPOWife (Romeo&Juliet, Troilus&Crisedye, Bogey&Bacall, Gable&Lombard, Brigitte&Flav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 689 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

Haven't you taken enough abuse for one day? Sheesh. Some people are never satisfied.


703 posted on 01/27/2005 1:58:36 PM PST by SilentServiceCPOWife (Romeo&Juliet, Troilus&Crisedye, Bogey&Bacall, Gable&Lombard, Brigitte&Flav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 698 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
Library of Congress on Religion in Colonial America"

This link has church attendance at 75-80% and says diests were never more than a small group. Certainly not the largest group as you portrayed them.

704 posted on 01/27/2005 1:58:41 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 621 | View Replies]

To: 7thson

Thanks.


705 posted on 01/27/2005 1:59:26 PM PST by Quix (HAVING A FORM of GODLINESS but DENYING IT'S POWER. 2 TIM 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

"But I don't mind if others believe in deities. It doesn't affect me."

You've been so very effective at fooling me all this time!

Congrats, I guess.


706 posted on 01/27/2005 2:01:08 PM PST by Quix (HAVING A FORM of GODLINESS but DENYING IT'S POWER. 2 TIM 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mugs99
The signers of the Declaration"

And here is the religion of the signers of the declaration. Notice how few are Diests or Unitarians.

707 posted on 01/27/2005 2:02:31 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 558 | View Replies]

To: mugs99
Signers of the Constitution

Here's a similar link for signers of the Constitution.

708 posted on 01/27/2005 2:04:44 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 700 | View Replies]

To: SilentServiceCPOWife

Oh I see MM has taken abuse in your opinion but GOD hasn't taken any abuse with Atheists denying him?

I take it you have your priorites straight.


709 posted on 01/27/2005 2:06:40 PM PST by missyme (imho)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 703 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

You seem to assume that everything that came from under someone's pen in the 1st century was divinely inspired (or as you would probably put it, described the historical Jesus). The early church had to look into the consistencies or lack thereof between documents, its oral tradition and its own, historically developed theological norm. Stuff that got rejected, -- typically the Gnostic writings, -- was at odds with the Epsitles, the earlier Gospels, the common sense, and with some fundamentals of the faith. For example, the notion of Jesus as a supernatural divine being locked in a struggle with the evil Old Testament Jewish God -- while evidence is plentiful that he slept, ate, was tired, irritable, felt pain, and kept a pious Jewish attitude through it all -- is clearly a fantasy.

The Apocalypse comes from a credible source and contains normative Christian eschatology, consistent with the eschatological vision in the Gospel parables. It also correctly predicted the destruction of the Jerusalem Temple and the emergence of the Chruch Triumphant.


710 posted on 01/27/2005 2:09:11 PM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 697 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
Christianity was tailor-made for Rome, and of course, for the rest of Europe, as Rome went a-conquering. A perfect fit.

Actually, the Roman Empire had essentially reached its greatest extent in Europe at about the same time that the apostle Paul arrived at Rome. The growth of Christianity was not coextensive with the political power of Rome; many of the barbarians outside the borders were predominantly Christian. The Romans did not engage in missionary conquest; this is a modern fantasy.

Christianity was actually very poorly suited to Rome. Roman greatness had been based on two ideas: one, that the idea of Rome itself was a deity (expressed as Quirinus, the god of the Roman race, the genius of the City of Rome, Jupiter Capitolinus, etc.), and two, that each individual essentially had a duty to attain as much early glory as possible (expressed in political life as the cursus honorum, or obligation to climb the political ladder, or in military life as the idea of taking enemy prizes to dedicate back home to the gods).

Christianity was antithetical to these ideals. First, it expressed that all men were equal - that it was meaningless to be a Roman citizen, or a slave, or a patrician, or any other earthly status. Second, it expressed that earthly glory was meaningless - being an emperor was pointless if your immortal soul was imperiled. The vivid contrasts between the Christian ideals and the old Roman ideals produced violent conflict in the first centuries of the Christian era, and (according to some) eventually contributed to the collapse of the Western Roman Empire.

711 posted on 01/27/2005 2:11:58 PM PST by SedVictaCatoni (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 693 | View Replies]

To: annalex
t also correctly predicted the destruction of the Jerusalem Temple

Or correctly reported, at any rate.

712 posted on 01/27/2005 2:15:45 PM PST by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 710 | View Replies]

To: missyme
Oh I see MM has taken abuse in your opinion but GOD hasn't taken any abuse with Atheists denying him?

Do you think that God is so weak that he can't handle the abuse that you imagine that he's suffered in this thread? I certainly don't.

I take it you have your priorites straight.

And you would be correct. I do.

713 posted on 01/27/2005 2:18:35 PM PST by SilentServiceCPOWife (Romeo&Juliet, Troilus&Crisedye, Bogey&Bacall, Gable&Lombard, Brigitte&Flav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 709 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

I thought you would like this:

http://www.theinterviewwithgod.com/popup-frame.html


714 posted on 01/27/2005 2:24:52 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 635 | View Replies]

To: SilentServiceCPOWife

It's been a delight, but one of my main priorities will be home soon and I have to make dinner.


715 posted on 01/27/2005 2:28:22 PM PST by SilentServiceCPOWife (Romeo&Juliet, Troilus&Crisedye, Bogey&Bacall, Gable&Lombard, Brigitte&Flav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 713 | View Replies]

To: mugs99
There is absolutely no reason to believe that was written by St. Ignatious.

Paul described the gnostics and warned of such in his writings.

This is as phony as your 17% early American statistic.

716 posted on 01/27/2005 2:30:26 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 700 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
Explain to me, then, how a person can choose to believe.

Simple, you can choose to pretend to believe. As a child and young adult, I tried and tried to believe, but it just didn't take. I 'pretended' to believe by going to church and even participating in bible study activities. Eventually, I realized that I really didn't believe, and also realized that church was largely a social occasion for me, and stopped going.

717 posted on 01/27/2005 2:31:32 PM PST by Diverdogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 675 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
I just want to say that I have spent the last few (way to many) hours reading through this whole thread. It has been very interesting. Mineral Man, your thoughts, positions, opinions, and whatever have been very rational, logical, cool, calm, and collected. It has been very enjoyable reading all your responses. As one of the "soft atheists" your posts have helped me solidify my thinking.

I thank you, sir, for taking the time to engage in this discussion. Wish that we could discuss sometime over a couple of glasses of cognac, or beverage of your choice.

Missyme, (assuming you are still with us), you scare me.

718 posted on 01/27/2005 2:31:33 PM PST by weaponeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 699 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

Why are you somewhat unwelcoming to people encouraging you to believe?


719 posted on 01/27/2005 2:35:30 PM PST by Chunga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

As an atheist I need not say to the believer "There is no God."

I only say "I disagree with the statement (There is a God) that you just made.


720 posted on 01/27/2005 2:38:20 PM PST by Guilliamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 524 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700701-720721-740 ... 761-773 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson