[NutCrackerBoy]

I agree with you on the thrust, that the debate ought to be about the "propagation and fabric of society." I find it refreshing to hear someone say out loud (so to speak) that the state doesn't have an interest in promoting families.

For the purposes of persuasion, I find your choice of words in some cases to be unnecessarily blunt. The word sodomy is a gigantic distraction, and you don't need it. I think the word dysfunction could be avoided.

[NutCrackerBoy]

Yikes, I meant to say "promoting other-than-the-normal-kind-of families."

[UnbornChild]

I *am* arguing that the state has an interest in promoting families, promoting *functional* and *organic* families that arise from heterosexual unions, not the ones that arise from some dysfunction and that help populate homosexual-led families.