Skip to comments.
College Cancels Speech by Professor Who Disparaged 9/11 Attack Victims
NY Times ^
| February 2, 2005
| PATRICK D. HEALY
Posted on 02/02/2005 12:11:06 PM PST by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
University of Colorado, Boulder
Ward Churchill was critical of trade center victims.
1
posted on
02/02/2005 12:11:06 PM PST
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
Bit of a jerk, that fellow.
2
posted on
02/02/2005 12:15:08 PM PST
by
Tarpaulin
(Look it up.)
To: Swanks; neverdem
3
posted on
02/02/2005 12:16:00 PM PST
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: neverdem
It sure took them long enough to pull the plug on this jerk. Of course a picture is worth a thousand words. As the saying goes "Once a hippy always a hippy".
To: neverdem
I am willing to bet money no one threatened to bring a gun, they just can't admit to their liberal friends that money is more important than a fellow professors free speech.
5
posted on
02/02/2005 12:18:26 PM PST
by
mammer
To: neverdem
"His remarks about the victims of 9/11 are repellent, but our reaction to 'repellent' is how we test the right to free speech," Ms. Stewart said in an interview on Tuesday shortly before addressing the turn of events with the Hamilton faculty, who gave her a standing ovation.Actually, the reaction of being repelled by 'repellent' is how we test the decency and morality of a people...
6
posted on
02/02/2005 12:19:55 PM PST
by
trebb
("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
To: neverdem
That sorry bastard.(pardon my french)
Never Forget!!!!
7
posted on
02/02/2005 12:20:54 PM PST
by
processing please hold
(Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
To: neverdem
Deciding to not provide your podium to a total jerk is NOT a matter of free speech.
When the speaker is someone from the American Nazi Party, they seem to understand the issue correctly. They only stumble over themselves when the offended person is a leftist.
The real telling part of this whole episode is that Churchill had been the Chair of the Department of Ethics at CU!!
To: Tarpaulin
Not only a jerk....He's a fraud and a phoney.
He tries to portay himself as native American.
Native American leaders have challenged him, and he's unable to prove his supposed Cherokee heritage.
He has subsequently been denounced by native Americans.
His days as a professor in Colorado are numbered.
9
posted on
02/02/2005 12:22:07 PM PST
by
nuconvert
(No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR)
To: neverdem
GOOD! Get him where it will hurt the most -- his pocketbook! BTW -- If he truly believed the tripe he spews, he would not be on the lecture circuit earning extra money. Isn't that capitalistic and doesn't he eschew everything that capitalistic America stands for?? Hypocrite!
10
posted on
02/02/2005 12:22:13 PM PST
by
Polyxene
(For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
To: neverdem
"In the end, free speech couldn't happen at Hamilton." Oh, he can speak alright. No one except the college has the power to deny him that.
They just have to be prepared to accept the consequences of the free speech of others in response.
11
posted on
02/02/2005 12:22:39 PM PST
by
grobdriver
(Let the embeds check the bodies!)
To: neverdem
"We did our best to protect the principles and the values that we believe in - the right to speak, to study, to teach freely - but the point came that I simply felt that this threat was too large for us to handle," said Ms. Stewart, who was told by campus security that even additional police officers could not ensure safety.
Lies plain and simple. This guy is not Solomon Rushdie - it wasn't security that was the deciding factor, it was damage control on their own reputation. How about honesty for a change Ms. Stewart? We've had enough spin lately.
12
posted on
02/02/2005 12:23:03 PM PST
by
Sax
To: beltfed308
He isn't going for the "hippie" look.
He's trying to look native American. Which he's not.
13
posted on
02/02/2005 12:24:30 PM PST
by
nuconvert
(No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR)
To: neverdem
When they let a prolife,progun,procaptilist,anticommunist speak then they can bitch.
14
posted on
02/02/2005 12:24:31 PM PST
by
cksharks
(ew prayers for them because they will need it.)
To: pbrown
"His remarks about the victims of 9/11 are repellent, but our reaction to 'repellent' is how we test the right to free speech," Ms. Stewart said in an interview on Tuesday shortly before addressing the turn of events with the Hamilton faculty, who gave her a standing ovation.
Is Ms. Stewart the same academic who had to leave the President of Harvard's speech, sick to her stomach, when he opined that men and women have different characteristics?
15
posted on
02/02/2005 12:25:12 PM PST
by
Beckwith
(Barbara Boxer is the Wicked Witch of the West . . .)
To: neverdem
16
posted on
02/02/2005 12:25:17 PM PST
by
Lee Heggy
(For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong. H.L. Mencken)
To: neverdem
>> In his original essay, Mr. Churchill wrote that the thousands killed at the World Trade Center had played a role in American sanctions on Iraq that "translated, conveniently out of sight, mind and smelling distance, into the starved and rotting flesh of infants." <<
Typical America hating liberal. I really wish these folks would learn about what they are talking about. I've seen reports that Saddam would not allow the kids to receive the medicines sent. He wanted them to die in a ploy to have the sanctions removed. I wish I could find that thread.
17
posted on
02/02/2005 12:25:24 PM PST
by
appalachian_dweller
(I have no use for people who won't accept FACTS.)
To: the_Watchman
"The real telling part of this whole episode is that Churchill had been the Chair of the Department of Ethics at CU!!"
Yes, a man who has called for breaking people's kneecaps.
18
posted on
02/02/2005 12:26:45 PM PST
by
nuconvert
(No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR)
To: neverdem
"She denounced his comments in December, but said rescinding the invitation would harm First Amendment principles."
Where in the First Amendment does it protect the promotion of terrorism, and mass murder?
19
posted on
02/02/2005 12:28:21 PM PST
by
international american
(Tagline melting.............................................)
To: the_Watchman
The real telling part of this whole episode is that Churchill had been the Chair of the Department of Ethics at CU!! Don't you mean Ethnic Studies??
20
posted on
02/02/2005 12:28:53 PM PST
by
NathanR
(Mexico: So far from God; So close to the USA.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson