To: Howlin
Social Security is solvent. And Harry Reid said that it will be in "fine" shape for the next 50 years. Hope someone points out that that's exactly the problem - just when todays young folks will be on social security - it wont be there, - Social security based on a 52 year span of putting by $ - age 15 to 67 now.
So it's a problem that has to fixed that far ahead...
482 posted on
02/02/2005 5:35:43 PM PST by
maine-iac7
(...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." Lincoln)
To: maine-iac7
Trent Lott said tonight that he had voted against it twice, but now he's for it. Go figure.
492 posted on
02/02/2005 5:37:25 PM PST by
Howlin
(It's a great day to be an American -- and a Bush Republican!!!!)
To: maine-iac7
I am 21, EVERYONE I talk to about social security, most under the age of 27, agrees w/ Bush's plan for it.
496 posted on
02/02/2005 5:37:53 PM PST by
Claytay
("We will fight the terrorist till Hell freezes over. Then we'll fight them on ice.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson