Posted on 02/10/2005 9:51:40 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
​​​​The Easongate petition is online and ready for signature gathering! The petition is hosted over on my site. You can access it via the petition link on the menu bar above or by clicking on this link.
As of 9:44:32 PM Pacific on 2/10/2005 1542 people have signed the petition.
Update 6:04 PM Pacific: Your humble webmaster moved the petition database to a new database server with the capacity to handle more requests earlier today. This move was done to accommodate the CNN Advertisers database we are building. Long story short, I forgot to update the petition page code and this resulted in it being broken for a few hours. It is fixed now. My apologies.
Posted by: Charles | Comments (29)
As of 9:51:28 PM Pacific on 2/10/2005 1542 people have signed the petition.
We the undersigned, request that Mr. Eason Jordan, Chief News Executive for CNN, release a transcript of his remarks while participating in a forum entitled, "Will Democracy Survive the Media?" at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland on January 28th.
Mr. Jordan has been reported to have charged the US military with intentionally targeting journalists. If he has evidence of such acts, we request that it be aired so that appropriate investigations may be undertaken by the US government. We will readily assist in forwarding these claims to our elected leadership.
If Mr. Jordan did in fact allege these acts, and has no such evidence, we ask that he be removed from his position immediately.
We request a reply by the 15th of February. If one is not forthcoming, we will begin to pressure key CNN advertisers and investors and make them aware of Mr. Jordan's reported remarks.
Please consider how CNN can retain its moniker as "the most trusted name in news" if Mr. Jordan does not clarify his comments by releasing a transcript.
We await your response.
Done.
Thank you!
Guess I should ping some more folks for help on this petition.
Bring all your friends and sign the partition.
A LITTLE MORE COLUMBO, AND A LITTLE LESS SLEDGE HAMMER
****************************************************************
Kerry Spot [ jim geraghty reporting ]
[ kerry spot home | archives | email ]A LITTLE MORE COLUMBO, AND A LITTLE LESS SLEDGE HAMMER
I was exchanging emails with another blogger, Paul, who asked the good question, “Aside from "forcing" the resignation of Jordan, what is there to accomplish? Can CNN be shamed into behaving better?”
The question deserves some thought. What has the goal of the blogs in this case been? In the case of the CBS memos, it was pretty clear – to confirm suspicions that the memos were fake, and then squeeze a retraction out of a stubborn network digging in its heels.
Calls for Jordan’s resignation or firing appeared almost immediately after the initial reports of this. While I think making an accusation of murder on stage, at the Davos forum, and then not offering any proof is awfully shaky behavior for a news executive, the length of Jordan’s employment at CNN is ultimately up to his bosses. In my humble opinion, calls for Jordan’s dismissal shouldn’t come before calls for the release of the videotape of the event.
I replied to Paul that, “I'm starting to think some bloggers A) want to "get" Jordan the way it was widely perceived that the blogs "got" Dan Rather and B) use this event to promote their blog and get media appearances, writing gigs, etc. … All of this is putting the cart before the horse. Job one is: Just what did Jordan say?”
We have heard accounts from Abovitz, MacKinnon, Gergen, Frank, Dodd, two accounts in French from Bernard Rappez, and Justin Vaisse and Jordan and Sambrook. The first seven sources offer accounts that are essentially the same – Jordan made the accusation, Frank challenged him, and Jordan backtracked. How much be backtracked and how clearly he rescinded the charge vary from account to account.
By comparison, Jordan and Sambrook paint a scenario where the CNN executive didn’t really make the charge, the controversy was really stemmed more from misinterpretation on the part of the audience.
With the score 7 to 2, we think we know what happened. The fact that Abovitz and others are calling for the release of the tape, and Jordan isn’t, suggests that one side is more confident of what that tape would show than the other.
But before anybody can demand stiff consequences for Jordan, we ought to get the facts clear on just what he said. Rony Abovitz’s account is pretty damning. Others are a bit more of a gray area. A couple of folks suggest that this is just a lot of hype over a Jordan “misstatement.” I humbly submit that “Too many OB-GYNs aren’t able to practice their love with women all across this country” is a misstatement. This sounds – in most of the accounts – to be something a bit bigger, and a bit more deliberate.
Unfortunately, I think the effort to get to the bottom of this has been hampered by… an eagerness to get to the full-throated denunciation of Jordan before the fact-gathering is finished.
Let’s be honest about the power of the blogs – it is great and was unimaginable in an earlier era, but it is limited.
And the blogs alone didn’t “get” Dan Rather. Nor Trent Lott, or did they single-handedly bring the accounts of the Swift Boat Vets for Truth to light. At some point in all of these stories, members of what is sometimes too-easily labeled the mainstream media got interested (often hearing about them from the blogs), couldn’t resist their news-worthiness, and decided to write or broadcast about them. And by doing so, they brought the story to the attention of millions of readers and viewers who, alas, don’t read blogs every day.
For whatever reason, many, many mainstream media institutions have decided to take a pass on this story. Maybe they can’t sort out the “seven folks said one thing, Jordan and Sambrook say another” contradictions. Maybe they think that only a bunch of guys in pajamas care about this. Maybe they sympathize with Jordan, and feel an element of “there but for the grace of God go I” humility. Or maybe they want to work for CNN someday.
In the face of all this, it’s important that those of us who think Jordan’s comments deserve more coverage act… rational, balanced, evenhanded, and shed more light than heat.
I just came across a transcript of the first discussion of this on a cable news show, on Kudlow and Kramer, on CNBC, on Monday.
KUDLOW: We got a couple of seconds before the break when you guys are all going to come back, but, Ann, I just want to give you first whack at this. Eason Jordan, top news executive at CNN — I mean, to me, this is absolutely incredible — this guy says at a big conference in Davos that the US military is deliberately targeting and assassinating American journalists. Huh? He still has a job, huh? You got a take on that?
Ms. COULTER: Would that it were so!KUDLOW: Would what were so?
Ms. COULTER: That the American military were targeting journalists.
KUDLOW: Oh, no! Don't go there.
Ms. COULTER: No, but, I mean, he immediately — it was just an incredibly cowardly thing to do. He says it, he immediately backs down to — from the statement that it is official government policy to be targeting journalists to, `Oh, it's just a rumor I've heard' and it might just be a few random individuals about which he has no facts, so it's a story that's not only implausible but not particularly interesting to what he has backed down to.
A little later in the discussion:
KUDLOW: Ann Coulter, I want to go with you. I'm going to give you the last word on a completely different subject, but I know you have knowledge on it. General Wayne Downing, a retired four-star, former head of special ops, told this show Friday that basically the time had come for surgical strikes in Syria. Do you have a quick, concluding thought on that?
Ms. COULTER: Yes, they should do that right after targeting the journalists.
Well that’s just great. Here we are, trying to convince journalists to pay attention to this story, trying to persuade them that Jordan’s comments warrant coverage, trying to get them to push Davos to release the tape, and Ann Coulter, in the very first comments of the very first television segment on this story, has to joke about how great it would be if the American military targeted journalists.
To use the metaphor of T.V. cops, as we bloggers try to build a public consensus that the tape ought to be released in order to clear the air, we need a little more Columbo, and a little less Sledge Hammer.
[Posted 02/09 08:16 PM]
bump
Need some help with a petition.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1338447/posts
Eason's Fables-- the sordid Jordan Story
various FR links & stories | 02-08-05 | the heavy equipment guy
Posted on 02/08/2005 4:25:08 AM CST by backhoe
fyi
Ann makes an outrageous statement...and does not help her rep or our cause..I love to read Ann sometimes..but this side of her turns me off..She can use wit much better that this.
I agree..RELEASE THE VIDEO!
Help us with the petition.
Well that too. This petition is just for a statement from CNN's Eason Jordan. This is gonna get interesting.....I think he is now in a nasty headlock. As he should be. Got some names you can ping for this?
I got a server error when I signed.
bttt
I get;
The requested document does not exist on this server.
Humor - as carried in the 'outrageous' speaks a truth that is often more recognizeable than if one were to 'preach' etc.
Ann is invited on these shows because she has a biting sarcasm that speaks to the 'outrageous'; it is what she does and most often; she nails it appropriately.
What Libs most often say. . .do. . .believe IS outrageous; Ann just goes there, with them. . .exposing the truth of the matter.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1340967/posts
CNN Executive in Hot Seat Over Iraq Claim
Reuters ^ | 02/11/05 | Paul J. Gough
Now we are really heating up!
Thanks.
Now what is the problem with the petition, did you have any problems getting to it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.