To: Mind-numbed Robot
Wind energy, both on-shore and offshore is very much economically feasible. While it's certainly not predictable or constant like a gas peaker or baseload coal/nuclear, generating electricity from wind and interconnecting it into the grid is becoming more and more commonplace. Initial capital costs of wind energy are higher than most forms of power generation (except solar and nuclear), but wind energy has no fuel to be purchased and delivered, and it has no waste to be disposed of or regulated. Check this out:
http://www.hornsrev.dk/Engelsk/default_ie.htm
14 posted on
02/19/2005 10:49:16 PM PST by
DTogo
(U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
To: DTogo
Well, no waste except all those ground-up condors.
15 posted on
02/19/2005 10:52:54 PM PST by
patton
(Matthew 6:6)
To: DTogo
Thanks for the information and the link.
18 posted on
02/20/2005 11:56:45 AM PST by
Mind-numbed Robot
(Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
To: DTogo
With the Horns Rev project it will be possible to determine whether or not the Danish Governments ambitious energy plan is feasible. According to the plan, wind turbines with a total capacity of 4000 MW must be established in Danish waters before 2030.Sounds good on paper, as do most alternative energy plans, but the engineering and economic feasibility have yet to be proven. I hope it works.
19 posted on
02/20/2005 12:04:11 PM PST by
Mind-numbed Robot
(Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson