Greetings CHARLITE! Are we actually living on the same planet? If you have actually reviewed all the evidence, there can be NO doubt whatsoever that Michale Shiavo (HINO)
wanted to be rid of Terri, one way or another, from the get go!
His total and complete failure (refusal) to act in her behalf on the night of her dire need for help, especially since he was prior trained to help in such circumstances, is all one needs to know regarding his continuing efforts to have Terri executed!
Because he fears she will be able to testify against him regarding his prior brutality, which left her near death on that night, he has done nearly everything imaginable to end her life... and his absolutely absurd DEMAND that she be IMMEDIATELY burned to a crisp on the day of her death... hence completely obliterating all evidence of his prior brutality... is all one needs to know regarding the deviant and deadly activities of the HINO !!!
Everything else falls properly into place (e.g., "Is that bitch dead yet?" ...."When is that bitch gonna die?") There is NO other reason why the HINO has refused to allow her to have much needed therapy... or even a wheelchair!
I hope and pray the HINO will not now smother her... or insert some death causing substance into her body... because he must now be in a nearly uncontrollable, desperate state of mind, needing to silence Terri permanently !!!
Wake up, CHARLITE, we are both right here on planet Earth !!!
Hullo?
I posted JB's article to stimulate comment and discussion. Just because a FReeper posts an article doesn't automatically mean that he or she agrees with the thesis, arguments or conclusions of the piece.
I happen to agree with all that you've said in your post. The only element in JB's commentary with which I agree is this. There should have been an independent expert medical panel - with no interest in which side benefitted from their conclusions - who should have done an extensive examination of Terri's condition.
Further, there should have been an intensive investigation of all aspects of abuse by Michael upon Terri prior to the "accident" which left her in this condition. Michael's statements about Terri's condition have been proven to be lies. Why wouldn't his version of the events which caused her disability also be highly questionable?
Finally, I agree with all those who say that an immediate divorce decree, should be obtained on behalf of Terri, so that her ex-husband can no longer be considered as her guardian or "acting according to her best interests."
Incidentally, I even disagree with my friend, JB, in the matter of his "no position" position in the Schaivo case. "I'll pass....." doesn't impress me, personally. If ever there was a case on which any thinking, feeling, compassionate, pro-life citizen should take a strong, resolute stand, morally, ethically, religiously and legally, this is such a case!
My friend, JB Williams, seems to start out saying that he is pro-life, but "doesn't know enough" to have an opinion, one way or another. Then he suggests an expert medical panel. Then he concludes by saying that he has decided to "pass." I don't actually understand why a good, mostly always persuasive writer would set out to address such a thumping important case of life and death, and then wimp out at the end of the piece, suggesting (as I read it) that unless all of us out here who care deeply for Terri's survival, have all the evidence, then we should all "pass" on coming to any conclusions or holding/expressing any opinions. Rather vapid conclusion, in my opinion.
So, "GeekDejure," as much as I LOVE your FReeper name, I must reiterate that not all posters put up pieces because they agree with them. Sometimes, it is just the opposite, as it is in this case. It was posted for the purpose of stimulating discussion.
How'm I doin' so far with that angle?
Char :)