Democratic legislation is persona non grata as far as I'm concerned. The minority Party has no business trying to wag the whole Senate dog.
No doubt that good man Hastert will see that the House never touches such Democrat-tainted garbage, either.
Not a singler piece of Democrat-sponsored legislation should see the light of day until each and every one of President Bush's judicial nominees has received an up-or-down vote in the senate.
We'll just put that in the STFU file for now, mmmmmmkay?
She's supposed to be a smart woman but she has stupidly concluded that these too shooting victims are somehow more dead than they would have been had some other type of weapon had been used.
We need to launch a liberation front, we need to bring freedom's truth to the masses!!
Stop the slavers. Emancipate the people.
Democratic legislation is persona non grata as far as I'm concerned. The minority Party has no business trying to wag the whole Senate dog.
No doubt that good man Hastert will see that the House never touches such Democrat-tainted garbage, either.
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
Elementary deduction
Monday, January 17, 2005
Sherlock Holmes could teach deductive reasoning to the National Academy of Sciences.
Holmes, the quintessential detective created by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, knew that by eliminating all other factors, the remaining one must be the truth.
An NAS panel created during the Clinton administration -- and infested with gun-grabbers -- issued a 328-page report on gun control. It studied hundreds of articles, books, government publications, gun-control laws and its own empirical work.
But its exhaustive study -- analyzing the former ban on so-called assault weapons, the Brady Act, one-gun-a-month buying restrictions and gun locks -- could not identify any benefits of gun control.
Crime was not reduced. Accidents were not lessened.
But after studying each specific issue, the panel's inductive reasoning only concluded that more study was needed.
Citizens in more than 30 states may carry concealed weapons legally. If they were injuring others or themselves, it surely would have produced front-page, above-the-fold stories with screaming, large-type headlines.
Mr. Holmes also knew what silence could say. Because the guard dog did not bark in "Silver Blaze," Holmes easily deduced the truth about a horse thief.
Since the panel's findings leave proponents speechless, deducing the truth about gun control is just as easy. Elementary, actually.
-- from http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/tribune-review/opinion/archive/s_293242.html
Up yours, Demonrats. None of YOUR bills are passing until at least 2008.
Do they even have the votes?
Back on March 2, 2004 the vote was
YEAs 52
NAYs 47
Not Voting 1
To extend the AWB, Remember the amendment passed.....
Now after the election and w/ 4 new repubs how will the voting go?
This is just a posturing introduction.
Why don't the democrats just cut the BS and introduce bills to
Outlaw unhapiness
Outlaw rich people
Outlaw mean people
Outlaw anyone who does not agree with feminists
or
Make a law which says the DNC platform is mandatory thought.
My advice is not to drag one's feet; if you want an AR or related weapon and the standard magazines to go with it, get it now - do not delay - because who knows what the future holds. The RATs are down, but they are not out.
I wouldn't doubt that a Republican put her up to is just to keep the money flowing from the NRA. Okay, I'm only kidding. Sort of.
She has been waiting for just such events as what passed here in SoCal to renew her rant. BTW, the "Assault Weapons Ban" is still intact here, so What the FReep? The commie child of questionable parentage Antonio Villaragosa is bragging about his soponsoring and passing of it in his run for LA Mayor.
|
Silly Californians. Why don't they just outlaw killing other people?
As a senator she ought to know that at the very least, the 2nd Ammendment was written to protect the states from federal infringements on the 'right to keep and bear arms'. And at the very most, allows individuals the opportunity to keep despots and tyrants of her ilk where they belong: overthrown and in prison.
Hey Dianne, one of the general government's duties is to protect this nation's borders. What, praytell inspires you to attack law-abiding gun owners while doing nothing to address the illegal invasion taking place at this very moment on our southern border? A distraction maybe? Honestly, it's nothing less than your malfeasence as a U.S. senator.
As a member of the state's militia (a product of birth and longevity) I resent having a white flag flown on my behalf in surrender. Give me a ban, give me a defeat.
Not to worry coastal dwellers, there are plenty of bunkers east that'll slow any ill advances. If you see the signal two, when warned: one, if by Nevada, two if by Korean firecracker, duck. Duck yo ass down.
AK-47 rifles are not legally available in California. They are illegal and have been outlawed in California for over four years.
This proves the tyrannical gun laws of California do nothing but strip arms from the person who follows the laws. Yet she continues to say that more laws will solve the problem when they haven't yet or won't ever.
Of course Dianne Feinstein has a gun or armed bodyguards. She is one of the biggest hypocrites.
She got her article in the Comical, and she'll get one in the L.A. Times, and that will be the end of it. Legislation introduced by Democrats may be Big Noise in the media, but it's not going anywhere. This is just a publicity stunt for the folks back home.