Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is it time for a March on the SCOTUS and the Judiciary and the Senate?
Free Republic | March 2, 2005 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 03/02/2005 1:24:42 PM PST by Jim Robinson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 441-454 next last
To: Jim Robinson
Lets roll.

And I will bring a bunch of people with me from Florida and Pennsylvania..

81 posted on 03/02/2005 1:53:27 PM PST by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Hi Jim - Did you know Roger Hedgecock is planning a big "Hold Their Feet to the Fire" trip in April? According to Roger, there are several other talk show people also arranging to join in on the trip. They are planning on 1000 people. Their main focus will be protecting our borders.

I'm wondering if maybe you should contact Roger and see if they might want to join in your MARCH. If you're looking for a good date to march, those extra people would give us a lot of leverage - and I know the trip is scheduled for April. http://www.rogerhedgecock.com

I do so want to be there - but it's just not possible right now.


82 posted on 03/02/2005 1:53:40 PM PST by CyberAnt (Pres. Bush: "Self-government relies, in the end, on the governing of the self.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I with you Jim.


83 posted on 03/02/2005 1:54:14 PM PST by JimWforBush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Great idea. I have another idea that might garner some attention: make these judges into well-known public figures.

One of the enabling features of judicial tyranny is the relative anonymity of the would-be judicial tyrant. They hide behind these ambiguously-worded rulings on the "constitutionality" of a law, and hope that most people aren't dogged or thorough enough to figure out what they are up to. Wouldn't we have a great impact if we started running full page ads in newspapers with a picture of a judge next to a description of their activist ruling, plus their office phone numbers so that we can call and demand that the will of the people be felt? Can you imagine a judge in a state who just decreed that the prohibition on same-sex marriage is "unconstitutional" having to actually deal with his face (and his office number) plastered all over a full-page ad in his local paper describing what he just did?

Maybe I'm all alone on this, but I really believe that most judges would think twice about creating law from "on high" if they knew that they were going to be deluged with irate phone calls from outraged citizens, and that they would be instantly recognizable and notorious for their actions. These judges need to made aware of the fact that the people aren't going to stand for this anymore.

What do people think about this idea? If enough people are interested, maybe we can take up a collection and pool our efforts.


84 posted on 03/02/2005 1:55:00 PM PST by Deo et Patria (Deo et Patria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

My letter - hand delivered to the office of Frist:

We the people of the United States worked hard donated our hard earned money and elected Republicans to the US Senate. We expected a lot to happen!!!! Nothing has. It is still a WIMP club where the Republicans kowtow to the left-wing fascist anti-American democrats in hopes of being invited to the next golf outing.

It is a shame that I have not heard one Republican stand up for this country and the voters and tell the democrats to go to hell.

Now the Supreme Court has decided it can dictate law to the States. Where are our Senators, hiding in their plush offices waiting for their personal hair stylist or licking to boots of the anti-American democrats to curry favor.

It is a disgrace that we who have worked so hard, voted and gotten others to vote are being tossed on the trash heap by WIMP assed Republicans who are afraid of the left-wing anti-American Traitor democrats.

Do your jobs, kick some democrat ass!!!!!!


85 posted on 03/02/2005 1:55:05 PM PST by YOUGOTIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

Yes. According to Article 3 of the Constitution, Congress has the power to limit the Supreme Court by simply placing a law outside outside the SC's scope of review.


86 posted on 03/02/2005 1:55:41 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (God is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
"Are we forgetting POTUS has the final say over decisions he feels SCOTUS makes badly??"

Excuse me?

What contry are you from stranger?

87 posted on 03/02/2005 1:55:47 PM PST by G.Mason ("If you are broken It is because you are brittle" ... K.Hepburn, The Lion In Winter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Goddess

Ms. Goddess : Scalia quotes Fed 78 in his dissent!
See - you think just like one of the GOOD justices. See the link to the decision above. Scalia's dissent is at the end...


88 posted on 03/02/2005 1:57:22 PM PST by BigEdLB (BigEd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

When and where. I suspect you will get a lot of support. get the word out on Hannity and other locals if they've got the guts to play it.


89 posted on 03/02/2005 1:59:24 PM PST by phasma proeliator (It's not always being fast or even accurate that counts... it's being willing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; Carl/NewsMax; KylaStarr; Cindy; StillProud2BeFree; nw_arizona_granny; Velveeta; ...

ping


90 posted on 03/02/2005 1:59:28 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Count me in.


91 posted on 03/02/2005 2:00:14 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

I'm in, for whatever the ruling. It has to be as big as possible.

For me, I figure I have one more peaceful try left in me before I give up on the republicans for good.


92 posted on 03/02/2005 2:00:21 PM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

"Are we forgetting POTUS has the final say over decisions he feels SCOTUS makes badly??"

I think we got rid of this principle in 1776.


93 posted on 03/02/2005 2:00:58 PM PST by proud American in Canada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Didn't the Congress just do that recently - wherein the legislation read that no redress would be allowed to the USSC ..?? I seem to remember something about that - but I can't seem to find anything about it.


94 posted on 03/02/2005 2:01:10 PM PST by CyberAnt (Pres. Bush: "Self-government relies, in the end, on the governing of the self.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

We are the backbone of congress. If they are spineless it is because we are missing at the switch! Let's go give'm back their spine.


95 posted on 03/02/2005 2:01:14 PM PST by Les_Miserables
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; kristinn; tgslTakoma; Angelwood; BillF; BufordP; FreeTheHostages
Troublemaker alert.

How unsophisticated to think that our justices should not be informed by opinions from international courts.

This jingoist attitude must cease.

;>)

96 posted on 03/02/2005 2:02:28 PM PST by Jimmy Valentine's brother ( We need a few more Marines like Lt. Gen. James Mattis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Les_Miserables

I'm preparing a letter as we speak - it's not going to be nice - but it's going to be truthful!!


97 posted on 03/02/2005 2:02:38 PM PST by CyberAnt (Pres. Bush: "Self-government relies, in the end, on the governing of the self.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Hand out a date/time group and we'll make plans.

Memorial Day weekend would have some neat significance.


98 posted on 03/02/2005 2:03:53 PM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phasma proeliator
Also get the word to Laura Ingraham, and Hugh Hewitt...

Ms. Ingraham was seething this AM she would probably give a very sympathetic ear to the idea...

She had Mark Levin, Hannity's buddy on too. NY folks - He'd probably be sympathetic. Get the word to him...

Whether on not we want 17-18 yr-old to be juiced, (I have no problem with it) this is becoming an issue of American Soverignty, and even those who may agree with the result should be concerned...

99 posted on 03/02/2005 2:04:15 PM PST by BigEdLB (BigEd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

"If they can do it in Lebanon, we can do it here!!"

So very true.

Seriously, though, because of distance and having kids in school, the chances are slim to none but if I can possibly make it, I will be there.


100 posted on 03/02/2005 2:04:31 PM PST by proud American in Canada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 441-454 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson