[Conspiracy Guy]

No. You did not read what I was responding to. The thank a scientist post from Mongo. He worships science so I asked why they can't take basic elements of animals and alter them.

I'll ask you why they can't create life from the basic elements? If randomness can do it why can't science?

[VadeRetro]

And that also is not something evolution is about. I don't think you know either what you said a post or two ago or what you're talking about now.

[Mongeaux]

"No. You did not read what I was responding to. The thank a scientist post from Mongo. He worships science so I asked why they can't take basic elements of animals and alter them."

I don't worship Science - but I like what it has done for me. Science saved my little daughters life twice and mine a few times too.

I worship Nicole Kidman! Yummmm.....

[CarolinaGuitarman]

So, the fact that scientists can't make an elephant out of a one celled organism is evidence that evolution is bunk. Gotcha.
They're not alchemists or magicians.

Your equation of randomness = evolution is false too. Natural selection is anti-random; if it were random than it wouldn't matter what the organism's genes were, each individual would have an equal chance of survival.
Natural selection says that that is not true. Given that it is a fact that populations in a species vary from individual to individual, and that this variation is inherited from generation to generation to a large degree (some of the variation is due to the environment and is not inherited), and granted that it is also a fact that there is a struggle for existence and a scarcity of resource's(some individuals in a population are better adapted to that population's environment than others) and therefore the individuals better adapted to their environment will have a better chance (not certainty mind you, but chance) of passing their genes on to the next generation; granted this(and I don't see how anybody can really deny these points) the only logical conclusion is that these populations will change over time.
How fast they change is what evolutionists are debating; ID isn't necessary.