Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: winstonchurchill
What more can be said.

How about that advocates for the state such as yourself, an attorney at law, understand Florida Law and the holdings of the courts before they advocate for same. Is that too much to ask?

There is no court in the land that would execute a serial murderer on hearsay, yet you and the Florida courts advocate for the removal of her nourishment based on hearsay. It is disgusting and simply affirms in the mind of many the jokes about lawyers and oceans.

721 posted on 03/18/2005 3:13:59 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 715 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07
the Florida courts advocate for the removal of her nourishment based on hearsay.

All sides agree (including the parents) that the court must determine what Terri's wishes would be. Statements made by Terri to others are not hearsay. They are offered for the fact that she made them. You misapprehend the hearsay rule.

By the way, courts don't 'advocate', lawyers advocate. Courts decide.

725 posted on 03/18/2005 8:35:01 AM PST by winstonchurchill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 721 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson