To: sarasota
It's been explained a thousand times. He is a globalist who believes the nation state is dead and promotes border less trade zones. In other words he spit on his oath of office, and everyone on FR knew he would. But Kerry was just too much of a dork to allow in office. So it's still the lesser of two evils we are forced to vote for.
But when Bush calls honest concerned patriots "vigilantes" for monitoring the border he has crossed the line into an area each citizen is free to define.
To: MissAmericanPie
But Kerry was just too much of a dork to allow in office. And he's running again in 2008. The GOP had better field a candidate like Tancredo next time around or we might as well fling open the borders officially and be done with it.
To: MissAmericanPie
Well said. Kerry would've been equally as bad; probably much worse. For liberals, uncontrolled invasion by foreigners is good because they depend on socialist handouts, which translates into votes for democrats.
Bush and his fellow RINOs court the Hispanic vote (vainly) and realize that illegals provide slave labor for corporate interests who contribute to Republican coffers.
The end result is we're all screwed.
Viva America!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson