It would if the first statement was intentionally false swearing; not if it was inadvertent error. Self-correction is permitted before the matter becomes a crime.
Which side did you have in mind? Michael has made numerous contradictory statements under oath. I don't recall Judge Greer recoiling from those lies.
How do you "inadvertently" state that you saw A, and then self-correct to "well, I didn't really see A like I just said I did?"