Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nathan Zachary

I simply don't think they considered female homosexuality to be sex at all. There is no evidence to support the view that they share our modern conception of it; that there are many obvious places to mention it, and they are not mentioned, but the male version is specifically mentioned, supports this conclusion.


124 posted on 04/07/2005 9:08:03 AM PDT by thoughtomator ("The Passion of the Opus" - 2 hours of a FReeper being crucified on his own self-pitying thread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]


To: thoughtomator

What does 'thou shall not enjoy the fruit of thine own body' mean then?


128 posted on 04/07/2005 9:15:56 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

To: thoughtomator

Whould not, "thou shall not lie with thy neigbors wife apply equally to the female reader? The places where man in general are used, or "you"?
Thou means you the reader. So how could a woman reader have a lesbian relationship? Is the daughter of the neighbor not forbidden to lie with out of wedlock?


133 posted on 04/07/2005 9:23:57 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson