Posted on 04/09/2005 4:58:13 PM PDT by tutstar
Unless you're talking about throwing peaches at these judges, I don't think it's going to happen."
If it doesn't happen, then the Congress of the United States is siding with murderers and like the judges, proclaiming themselves the masters of the American people.
Not much difference between that and full fledged communism.
Judgenfuhrer George Greer's biography
scientology_and_terri_schindler_schiavo_death_connection
This is the 'tip of the iceberg' of what Terri and her family were up against.
Heres where Terri Schiavo Insurance money went:
These funds, the result of a malpractice suit, were meant solely to provide for Terri Schiavos care and rehabilitation.
=======================================================================================
Atty. Gwyneth Stanley - $10,668.05
Atty. Deborah Bushnell - $65,607.00
Atty. Steve Nilson - $7,404.95
Atty. Pacarek - $1,500.00
Atty. Richard Pearse (GAL) - $4,511.95
Atty. George Felos - $397,249.99
1st Union/South Trust Bank $55,459.85
Michael Schiavo - $10,929.95
Total: $545,852.34
Neglect and abuse complaints is that Michael Schiavo:
* Has not allowed therapy or rehabilitation since late 1992.
* Has prevented swallowing tests or swallowing therapy since 1993.
* Ordered caretakers not to clean Terri's teeth since 1995, resulting in removal of five teeth in April 2004.
* Placed Terri in hospice in 2000, despite the fact she is not terminally ill.
* Refuses to allow Terri to leave her room. She has not been outside since 2000.
* Ordered doctors not to treat Terri when she had a life threatening infection in 1993 and 1995.
Terri Schiavo had sustained a serious brain injury as the result of a suspicious incident in their home in 1990 and in 1992,
her husband had filed claims against several of her former doctors, claiming her collapse was caused by a misdiagnosis.
He received over $1.5 million in 1993 including $750,000 which had been specifically earmarked by the trial jury for Terris rehabilitation based on a life expectancy of 50 years.
Mary and Bob Schindler Sr., her parents, consulted a St. Petersburg attorney about removing Michael Schiavo as their daughters guardian and discussed the case at length with him.
Unfortunately, the Schindlers did not have the amount of money the attorney demanded as a retainer to take the case.
That attorney became the judge in the case-----a totally prohibited conflict of interest.
Thereafter, the attorney-judge approved the hiring of George Felos as the attorney for Schiavo to be paid from the trust fund and the stage was set for her judicial homicide.
The judge wasnt George W. Greer.
It was Mark I. Shames.
The money was then diverted to the Judicide G reer.
|
GREER DONOR |
AMOUNT |
POSITION |
ACTION |
Lawyers For |
Hamden Baskin III Felos & Felos Deborah Bushnell Gyneth S. Stanley Steven Nilsson Beth Wilson
|
$500 & $500 |
Michael Schiavos Lawyer[s] |
Greer |
|
Daniel Grieco
|
$300 |
Employer of Michael Schiavo at time of Feb. 25, 1990 then attorneyOf record for Michael up until the malpractice award, |
Incident when injuries occurred to Terri,Reappeared as attorney for selected pleadings |
State/County |
Frank Nagatani |
$50 and $50
|
DCF Attorney |
Squashed |
|
Bernie McCabe |
In-Kind |
State Attorney |
Allowed underling to appear in campaign ad for Greer |
|
Everett Rice |
$500 & In-Kind |
Sheriff/State Rep |
Didnt conduct criminal investigation into what really happened to Terri or allegations of abuse after initial incident |
|
John Carassas |
$100
|
Deputy Attorney General |
Florida Deputy Attorney General, involvement with |
|
James Hellickson
|
$150 & In Kind |
Assistant state attorney in office of Bernie McCabe, Pinellas/Pasco State Attorney |
|
|
Paula Shea |
In Kind |
Assistant Pinellas Public Defender |
Appeared in Greer Campaign Ad |
|
Andrew
|
$100 |
Officer in Guardianship monitoring program and Guardian ad litem pool |
Was supposed to: |
Misc. People w connections |
Richard La Belle
|
$100 |
Member of Board of Directors of |
Supposedly ACPD |
|
Battaglia, Ross, Disus and Wein
|
$250 |
Principal Kelli Crabb is past chairperson of Hospice Foundation of Florida Suncoast and member of Board of directors |
|
|
Gus Bilirakis
|
$40 cash |
Former Hospice Board member and of American Hellonic Education Progressive Assoc. (AHEPA) |
Felos past Governor |
|
Divito and Higham
|
$250 and $250 |
Law firm employed by St. Petersburg/Venice |
Terris Dioceses |
MICHAEL SCHIAVO'S lies and contradictory testimony in easy to read format
The Supremes never took the case, so they never had to give their opinion. They simply silently refused to hear the appeal.
For what it's worth, Judge Bork said on Hannity's radio show that he knew the Supremes would not take the appeal, because he knows they would never take a case about any law that was only about one person...in this case, Terri Schiavo. Yes, we know it had wider implications, but the law itself was only about Terri. He said it was doomed not to be heard, and the Congress should have known that.
I still can't believe they killed her.
Exod 20:13
Deut 5:17
Even if the attorneys for the dying woman were totally incompetent and made all the wrong arguments as he seems to think, has Judge Birch never heard of judicial notice? Apparently. Like the chancery courts and judges of Lord Coke's day, Judge Birch and his peers have so lost themselves in their own labyrinth of procedures that they cannot find the light switch of basic justice and truth. So it has come to this. The procedures established by the federal judges themselves at their own whim are now deemed by them of greater magnitude and importance than the inalienable rights of persons that the 14th Amendment was ratified to protect! This is judicial arrogance in its worst form, because it is a blinding arrogance that takes the whole sight from the eyes and causes the blind to follow the blind right over the cliff. This is Dred Scott all over again. A twelve year old is better suited to be a federal judge that Mr. Birch. He should be one of the first to be impeached. The last half of Judge Birch's opinion was dedicated to showing why the Court did not have jurisdiction and that Congress's law violated the separation of powers. Earth to Judge Birch, get a clue, Congress was trying to create jurisdiction for you because they probably knew you could not think this through on your own. He spent half his time explaining that he did not have jurisdiction, the other half making a bogus and intellectually bankrupt argument about a violation of separation of powers, when jurisdiction was the very thing that had been conferred on him by Congress under their 14th Amendment legislative power. But this is way too deep for a mind like that of Judge Birch. It is too big to fit in his little toy judge intellect box.
WOW! That was an awesome read. Thanks for posting. Wonder if Judge Birch has read it? Maybe we should email it to him. I'm thinking I will email to my senators/representative.
All of the federal courts based their rulings on "the process" of the trial and hearings .. not on "the facts", which is what Congress gave the federal courts permission to do. In effect what the courts did was thumb their noses at Congress .. by refusing to act upon their request.
Usually .. ruling on "the process" is what the Appeals courts do - it's a protection against improper law being applied (which it was - because they didn't apply the 14th), or making sure the lower court judge followed the law in the "process. But .. the President and Congress had requested that A DE NOVO hearing be held - meaning the courts should scrap everything and start over - after making sure Terri was being fed and was safe. The arrogant courts said NO.
Save for later
Exactly!! In Mark Levin's book, "Men in Black" he suggests 12 year terms. I agree - that is more than adequate.
"pay close attention to those we elect at home"
Excellant point!! One issue which has always bugged me is that when some of these judges are in the lower courts they have to run for office. At some point - they no longer have to provide any type of bio - and we don't get to know what their party affiliation is. We need to know that - because it does reflect their beliefs.
Also .. I believe judges need to be denied the right to DONATE TO A POLITICAL PARTY OR TO ANY ORGANIZATION, other than tithing and giving offerings to their church.
Tonight I saw the statement of the father of the little Lunsford girl who was perhaps "buried alive"?!!!! He was outraged and said he hoped Couey would BURN IN HELL!! Stuff like that. That's how I FEEL about greer, the HINO, felos and all of those monsters who participated in allowing Terri to be tortured, starved, and dehydrated to death.
Okay .. I'm game .. why do you think it's "disconnected from reality" ..??
Thanks for the ping!
If you are referring to the Dred-Scott, Terri Schiavo PDF file he linked, I would agree that the disconnect is from the judiciary's reality. Overall, the pdf file is right on target, albeit a distant one, though very relevant and worth the read. All of these decisions relating to the Terri Schiavo case are a result of the continuing consequence of extremely bad judicial decisions from yesteryear.
You had me at hello..
No more yearly Disney bucks from me..nada Floriduh tourist funds of any form unless Greer is impeached.
I don't care if he was elected and it's not "practical".
39,000+ votes and counting.....Get er done.
Not sure of the date - if you search for "DCF" you'll find the article which said the Greer had sealed the records.
"This is NOT the first murder by this team"
Oh great! Please tell me more - or point me to the info please.
Okay .. "turning over files" - I didn't hear that - I only heard Greer had ordered the files sealed.
Well .. if I worked at DCF - I would LOSE the files [Hillary got away with losing stuff for 2 years - surely that would be enough time to impeach Greer] - I might LOSE my job but the way they run things .. I don't think losing that job would be such a bad idea.
How the heck can we stop this guy from taking those files from DCF - or had he already done it ..??
"a meaningless law that was obviously unconstitutional"
No it wasn't meaningless - OR UNCONSTITUTIONAL! It's the arrogance of the courts who refused to follow the law. Please don't muddy the waters by making such an erroneous statement.
With the legislation was a Public Law 109-3. That Public Law was supposed to REQUIRE the courts to reinsert Terri's feeding tube. What happened to following that law. It was legal .. and it was well within the rights of Congress to write it, and to write the legislation as well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.