reading-impaired?
try posts 55, 102 & 134, just for starters
Your definition of bigots and that of the moderators must be different.
The victim had already been identified. Those posters did not pick it up.
132 wasn't posted when your post appeared.
You just added to the issue. I honor your opinion even so.
< reading-impaired?
try posts 55, 102 & 134, just for starters >
I'm trying really hard to figure out why this is posted to me?
Oh, silly me, I get it now.
You think I'm a bigot because I assumed attackers and bigots were both black because of the pictures.
Funny, I call that common sense.