Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N.C. State Bar Says No Corruption In Disciplining Of Lawyers Who Withheld Evidence
WRAL-TV ^ | April 13, 2005

Posted on 04/13/2005 8:38:47 AM PDT by NCjim

RALEIGH, N.C. -- The North Carolina State Bar said Tuesday that there was no corruption in how two attorneys were disciplined for the actions in the murder trial of Alan Gell.

Gell spent nearly a decade in prison for a crime he did not commit. Gell was released from death row when authorities discovered attorneys David Hoke and Debra Graves withheld important evidence in his murder trial. In September, a State Bar panel decided that Graves and Hoke did not intentionally withhold that evidence.

Hoke and Graves received a formal reprimand from the North Carolina State Bar, but continue to practice law. Some people, including Gell, say the reprimand is not enough.

In March, two committees reviewed the discipline and interviewed dozens of witnesses. Their goal was goal was to figure out whether the attorneys got off easy because of improper influence.

"We should report that the North Carolina State Bar prosecution of this disciplinary matter regarding these two lawyers, Hoke and Graves, fell within acceptable parameters," said Fred Moody, who served on the State Bar subcommittee.

"We did not find any corruption whatsoever," said subcommittee chairman Wade Smith. "Any misconduct whatsoever by the panel, by members of the State Bar, by anyone associated with the proceeding." The committees even called in an outside consultant who filed his own report on the case.

Smith said the investigation shed light on how cases could be better handled in the future.

"When we make our final report, we'll probably say there are some things we could have done better, should have done better, and improvements that can be made," Smith said.

Some possible changes include decreasing the workloads of State Bar attorneys who deal with disciplinary cases; getting an attorney outside the State Bar to handle high profile cases...

(Excerpt) Read more at wral.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 04/13/2005 8:38:49 AM PDT by NCjim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NCjim

Foxes guarding the hen house. You think criminal defense attorneys are bad? Prosecutors are much worse - anything for a conviction (and promotion).


2 posted on 04/13/2005 8:42:03 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

Slimy sob's giving other slimy sob's a clean bill of health.

The wrongly imprisoned spent ten years of his life
in a hellhole, the real criminals get a pass.


3 posted on 04/13/2005 8:42:51 AM PDT by dwilli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

I read this through twice--and I don't draw the conclusion that is has to be prosecutors that were investigated. The article is ill-written...you could just as easily assume that these were the wrongly convicted man's defense att'ies.


4 posted on 04/13/2005 8:56:15 AM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson