I'm no "evo" but the discovery of the fusion was discovered three years ago. So that indeed is "years" of assurance, if the discovery means what the discoverers say it means.
Yikes! That was the most poorly worded sentence of my career. To many "discover" words. Sorry.
IF it means what they say, but again it can only show where the cut and paste was done (or something that looks like a c and p). There observations can't say what force did the cutting and pasting.
Besides, they act like it was NOT established before their research, so if they are right then the evos on this board were wrong to claim it was. If they are wrong about the importance of the evidence then why should I believe their evidence?