Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Thatcherite
Why don't you endorse the Biblical position then?

Sorry about the last response, your clarification was not posted when I answered.

Because "that" is not the Biblical position.

342 posted on 05/03/2005 9:39:17 AM PDT by AndrewC (Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies ]


To: AndrewC

That's OK the fault was my carelessness.

What view do you take for example of the Exodus 20 20:21 that say that if the death of a beaten slave is delayed by a day from the beating then no offence has occurred.

And what is your view on the stoning of "stubborn and rebellious" children?


343 posted on 05/03/2005 9:43:19 AM PDT by Thatcherite (Conservative and Biblical Literalist are not synonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies ]

To: AndrewC
Because "that" is not the Biblical position.

Interestingly that is not amongst your fellow Christian Ahban's responses. He appears to see those things as the Biblical position AFAICS in this thread. At the very least he has never unequivocally denied it (as you have).

345 posted on 05/03/2005 9:50:04 AM PDT by Thatcherite (Conservative and Biblical Literalist are not synonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson