But I'm done being civil with you. You're simply a liar. My casting a vote to keep my state government out of peoples bedrooms does not equate to the oligarchial federal courts issuing opinions rife with lunacy and abridging powers that rightfully belong to the people through their elected representatives.
Got it Comrade?
Well, at least one lawyer managed to discern that little subtle distinction to which you allude. :)
The only judge I have ever seen this guy be critical of is Roy Moore. He has gone out of his way to justify other judges like O'Connor and Kennedy when they use international law by trying to compare it to Scalia using English common law - the basis for our laws (as if the 2 are even comparable). He's also constitutionally smarter than lawyers like Scalia, Marc Levin, Jonathan Turley, and Orrin Hatch. I've noticed the same arrogance in many lawyers. It must be the law schools that do it to them.
My casting a vote to keep my state government out of peoples bedrooms does not equate to the oligarchial federal courts issuing opinions rife with lunacy and abridging powers that rightfully belong to the people through their elected representatives.
Right. So you agree with the result but you don't think it should have come from the Supreme Court. That's what I said. If you don't want the decision to come from a state court either, this is the first time you've suggested as much in this thread.