Replies

CFR is one of the most useless pieces of legislation ever and has in no way impeded the electoral process. Perhaps it escaped your notice that last election was dominated by the Swiftboats Vets ads? And that there was NO reduction of free speech merely through controls on Parties (which our Founders never wanted at all)?

Bush proposes to do NOTHING by presidential fiat wrt illegals. It would be an act of Congress. But not being a real conservative you would not get your facts straight.

GWB is so conservative that he drives the RATmedia and its believers insane with rage. Faux conservatives also do not like him believing that some "more" conservative candidate is available.

Of course, true conservatives well understand there was NO more conservative candidate available. And they understand there IS NO more conservative candidate available. Bush was the MOST conservative governor in the nation which anyone knowledgeable of politics must admit.

Faux conservatives propose candidates capable of getting defeated but not winning. Hence, no one serious pays any attention to their raving.

You do admit and I recognize that GWB is not the ideal conservative candidate. Anti free speech is not conservative. Opening our borders to invaders from the south is not conservative. Allowing a $100 billion monthly trade imbalance seems hardly conservative. Does it to you?

I bet you are a Rush follower. I hear it every day. GOP good. Dems bad. Doesn't matter what the issue is, oh, I forgot, Rush does criticize GWBs handling of the criminal alien problem. I suspect that I am more traditional as a conservative than many on these threads. I am for conserving the US Constitution and by way of that, our Nation. I am not only for the conservation of a political party. BTW, is taking a point to an extreme a sign that I am not a true conservative? Yea, I know he can't do anything by fiat but his idea of law would. That is the point. He would call criminal aliens legal workers by a stroke of the pen. A person who refuses to uphold his oath of office is not a conseravtive in my estimation nor in the estimation of many Constitutionalists.