Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o
ping

Is this a big deal or not? I am pinging my better half (a recent contributor to our board) for her take. Especially, the comment on the Seamless Garment.

10 posted on 04/28/2005 3:43:27 PM PDT by don-o (Don't be a Freeploader. Do the right thing and become a Monthly Donor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: don-o

This is huge, in my opinion. We have been complaining in vain about this stuff for two decades.


14 posted on 04/28/2005 3:53:18 PM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: don-o

Papa Benedetto has it right that every act of intentional abortion infanticide, euthanasia, etc. is unambiguously condemned because its intention is to kill an innocent human being, either as a means or as an end.

War is more complicated because it is a complex of actions which must be judged one by one AND as a totality. It is possible for a war to be just in its inception and in its intentions (defensive, limited, legitimately authorized, last resort etc.) but still contain elements that merit unequivocal condemnation. Acts of war deliberately directed against civilians, for example, present precisely the same moral problem as abortion: the deliberate shedding of innocent blood, which is abominable in the eyes of God.

The death penalty -- carried out justly by the legitimate authoities --- is not condemned as murder, but is justified (according to the Catechism) if it is essential to the protection of public safety.

Pope Benedict, like his predecessor John Paul, has insisted that in modern times, maximum security prisons make its possible to incarcerate murderers and other violent felons without possibility of parole, and in such a way that they are no longer a threat to society. They have advanced the teaching that if this is possible, then executions should be vanishingly rare.

I myself wonder about the situation where a person already serving a life sentence, re-offends: say, by attacking another inmate or a guard. This would suggest that even imprisonment didn't suffice to secure public safety in his case; and I suppose that's where the death penalty would become legitimate.

As a Catholic I am obliged to follow the teaching here, as well as I can understand it. Anybody want to read what it says in Evangelium Vitae and the Catechism, and offer a fuller interpretation?

BTW HOORAY, punching the air and high-fiving for Cardinal Egan. I always rejoice to see a vertebrate Bishop.


34 posted on 04/28/2005 4:51:14 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (\\\The cafeteria closed. But the food's real good at the Bishop's Table. ///////)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson