Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Raycpa
The case cited was in regards to parental rights, not court rights.

Neither. Did you read it? It is about the rights of the pregnant minor.

The case struck down the law that required a doctor to provide parental notification. The case says that an abortion cannot be conditioned on parental permission, court permission, or parental notification.

68 posted on 05/01/2005 1:16:59 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
It is about the rights of the pregnant minor.

It is about her right to privacy. As a ward of the state, she has no privacy as to medical matters. All matters become subject to state oversight and therefore there are no issues of privacy at stake.

69 posted on 05/01/2005 1:20:19 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson