True but unfortunately you're not one of them. You're agenda extended to writing an ill informed essay about the Schiavo case.
You seem to think that having a verbal response to everything makes a point. It doesn't.
It does and you're non response to the points I made make an even bigger point. You're an ideologue uninterested in rational discourse.
My essay, again makes the essential distinctions, whether you like them or not. It will be judged not by what you say, or by what I say about it; but by how well it resonates with the individual readers.
Your essay sucks. That is of course, just one man's opinion. But there you have it.
I am going to dinner. But anyone interested can judge for themselves: Terry Schiavo: An End To Rational Analysis?
I've judged you and your essay wanting. Enjoy your dinner.
My concern over the fanaticism brought out by the Terry Schiavo case, is that it directly challenges fundamental principles of the American tradition; further, that because the media has been able to label it "right wing," and identify it with some Conservatives, it undermines the credibility of all of us. Finally, my concern, as a foe of legalized abortion, is that it sabotages 32 years of efforts to reverse the false reasoning behind Roe vs. Wade.
That is my only agenda. I do not in anyway seek to force the people of any other State or community to accept my social views, if they do not wish to. While I may seek to persuade them, I will never seek to change the rules of civil discourse and the legal limitations on Government--that is to misuse Government--to that end.