Untrue on the face of it. You have over and over again tried to impose your judgment of what constitutes 'quality of life', and then immediately used that judgment as a justification for willy-nilly revoking Terri Schiavo's inalienable right to live.
You will not find one place, where I have argued for imposing my judgment of what constitutes the quality of life on anyone else. I have invoked the concept to try to put some of the rant about Terry Schiavo in perspective. The point was not to impose an idea, but to suggest a whole wealth of considerations that some folk seem to be overlooking.
But what a silly term you invoke in response. "Willy nilly revoking" her right to live." Seven years of litigation, determining that she would not have wanted to live as less than a functional human being, is hardly "willy nilly." You are simply providing more and more evidence of your total lack of perspective or proportion here.