That's lifted straight from Robert Spencer's column, word for word. Doesn't Medved ever get any of his own original ideas? No. See my previous post on him and his connections to sleazy lobbyist Jack Abramoff. Did he discuss that on his show?
Michael Medved has been a movie reviewer for a few decades. Why would you think that he needs to "lift" someone else's material? Do you think only one person who has seen the film can identify the problems with it? Why do you have issues with Medved?