ah, but any cop can tell you that these things "escalate"...first he breaks into houses to get underware, but with time many of these men act on their fantasies. So you see kidnapping, rape and murder.
If he merely wanted ladies underware, he could easily buy it or shoplit it. Mail order catalogs and festish-R-Us stores are on line...and he'd probably be merely a fetish type, and stay that way.
But breaking into houses implies there is a fantasy involved of force...and that fantasy of force is the dangerous part. It's NOT just theft. It's a sex crime.
>>ah, but any cop can tell you that these things "escalate"...first he breaks into houses to get underware, but with time many of these men act on their fantasies. So you see kidnapping, rape and murder.
If he merely wanted ladies underware, he could easily buy it or shoplit it. <<
Exactly, the difference is consent - or more precisely, informed, adult, human, consent. As soon as you are talking about acts when everyone doesn't consent or anyone is underage or it involves animals, it becomes something the state has an an interest in preventing. You don't need a religious argument although you can certainly add that.
Paul from Atlanta
Such a wierdo probably wants underwear which is used. Though it is true you can buy such on ebay.