Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Awards $45,480 In Cat's Death
Seattle Times ^ | May 9, 2005 | Warren Cornwall and Craig Welch

Posted on 05/09/2005 6:46:54 AM PDT by MississippiMasterpiece

Paula Roemer knows most people don't understand her passion for animals.

Some of her North Seattle neighbors aren't thrilled about the crows she attracts to her back yard with bird seed, she says. When she rescued a scraggly kitten abandoned on a pathway while she was vacationing in Israel 13 years ago, people reacted with disdain.

So when a neighbor's dog mauled and killed that same beloved cat, Yofi, last year, Roemer barely mentioned it to people she knew. But now she feels that she found one person who understood: a judge.

Last week, Seattle District Court Judge Barbara Linde ordered the dog's owner to pay $45,480.12 to Roemer for the cat's death.

"Not too many [people] value a cat," said Roemer, a retired, 71-year-old former junior-high-school teacher, who lives alone except for her animals. "You know what I'm saying: 'It's just a cat.' And I'm very, very thankful we had a judge who knew that a cat had some value."

The judgment may be among the largest amounts nationwide in lawsuits over the loss of pets, according to Roemer's attorney, Adam Karp of Bellingham, a specialist in cases involving animals.

"I do think it's the largest in our state for any type of animal, excluding, say, a Thoroughbred or other commercially valuable pets, or service animals," Karp said. "And I'm pretty sure it's the largest for a cat."

In 2003, a Snohomish County couple was awarded $25,000 in emotional damages when someone who was supposed to care for a horse and goats instead sold them for slaughter.

In a recent Texas case, the owner of a Mini-Schnauzer was awarded $10,000 in emotional distress when the dog escaped from a Petco grooming parlor and was hit by a car, according to Associated Press reports. In one New York case, the court found that a good dog's value increased with age, and its owner should be compensated accordingly upon the pet's untimely death.

The defendant in the cat case, Wallace Gray, pleaded guilty to an animal-control violation last October in Seattle Municipal Court. Court documents say he admitted that his dog killed a neighbor's cat in February 2004 "due in part to my negligence."

Gray said he just learned of the financial judgment yesterday from a reporter. "This is way out of hand. This is absolutely crazy," he said.

Gray said he had already served 21 days in jail and three months under house arrest for the animal-control violation. He wasn't living in the house with his dog at the time of the attack, he said, and the acquaintance who was taking care of his dog left town before the trial.

"I'm sorry she lost her cat, but I had no control over it," Gray said.

Gray added that he thought the punishment was excessive considering that dogs and cats are natural enemies.

"Cats eat birds and dogs eat cats," he said.

Gray did not appear in court for the case and was not represented by a lawyer, Karp said.

Judge Linde could not be reached for comment.

While Roemer predicts she won't collect a nickel from the judgment, she and her attorney take the ruling as a message that even cats count. She plans to give any money from the case to an animal-protection group.

Her lawyer says the public perception of cats puts them at a disadvantage.

"I think there tends to be a culture that says dogs are more of man's best friends and cats are aloof and can't bond," Karp said. "But if anyone has ever shared their bonds with a cat, they know that's utter nonsense. I think our society tends to devalue cats, and I think the judgment recognizes that cats, too, can mean the world to people."

Still, Roemer said, that can't erase the painful memory of what happened last year in her back yard, or the loss of a cat that slept in her bed, curled up against her stomach, nearly every day since she rescued it.

Roemer was in Israel visiting friends in 1992 when she came across a heap of matted fur covered with flies. Roemer stopped to offer the cat some water from a bottle cap.

"Here's this one cat that saw me as a savior and I couldn't walk away from her," she said.

She named the cat Yofi and finagled her way through customs and back into the United States, with the tiny white and black kitten in a pet carrier.

Back in Seattle, Yofi became a fixture in Roemer's house, she said, befriending other cats and dogs she adopted.

Then, Roemer said, one day in February 2004 she heard screeching coming from her back yard and saw a neighbor's dog, a chow, holding Yofi in its jaws and shaking the cat. Roemer said she tried to rescue Yofi but lost sight of the cat while trying to save another one of her cats and get the dog out of the yard. She found the cat dead in another neighbor's yard the next day.

Roemer said Gray's dog had repeatedly escaped from its yard before the incident, partly because a fence on the side of the yard had large gaps.

Roemer said she sued Gray out of grief and frustration.

"I didn't go to court to get money," she said. "I could either burn his house down or I could go and shoot his dogs in front of him and shoot him, or I could shoot myself. So I decided to be rational and get a lawyer."

Now, the cremated ashes of Yofi rest in a small ceramic jar on a table in the living room of her small Northgate house. Behind it stands a large card with Yofi's name written across it and a montage of photos of Yofi inside.

The house is a testimony to her devotion to animals. A framed, hand-painted portrait of eight cats she has owned hangs in her bedroom. Boxes of cat-food cans rest on a spare bed in another room. A piece of cardboard sits in her living room near the television with detailed instructions on how to take care of the animals in case she can't.

Roemer still has the company of her other animals, a Husky mix named Ginger and three black-and-white cats, including the latest addition, Patsy Cline. She adopted that cat several months after Yofi died, when it cried one day as she looked at it.

She knows some people may find her odd for her love for animals. But she's past making apologies.

"It sounds crazy that I value my animals more than I do people. I help out people, too," she said. "It's just that in my personal life, I get along better with animals."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: activistjudges; animals; cat; cats; cityoflenin; crazycatlady; paws; peta; ruling; seattle; socialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-124 next last
Paula Roemer keeps two urns with ashes of beloved pets. Yofi's ashes, at left, are with a booklet Roemer created for court featuring pictures of the pet.

1 posted on 05/09/2005 6:46:54 AM PDT by MississippiMasterpiece
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

Only in a blue state...


2 posted on 05/09/2005 6:53:25 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

It's a CAT... These things happen. Good grief!


3 posted on 05/09/2005 6:54:36 AM PDT by Knute (W- Still the President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Knute

And if it was a smaller dog being mauled, would you still say, 'these things happen'?

Or a parrot? Hamster? Child?


4 posted on 05/09/2005 6:56:09 AM PDT by dionyza (Fortuna favorat audax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

Insane.


5 posted on 05/09/2005 6:57:07 AM PDT by Rennes Templar ("The future ain't what it used to be".........Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

Hmmm, actually since that company that clones cats does so at $50k a pop, the person who brought this suit should have sought an additional $50k as the cost of replacement. Now that would be an interesting case.


6 posted on 05/09/2005 6:57:16 AM PDT by New Orleans Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
Cha-ching!
"Cashin' in" must be use #102...


7 posted on 05/09/2005 6:57:47 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dionyza

Excuse me, but I would hardly classify a child with a parrot, hamster, or cat.


8 posted on 05/09/2005 6:58:06 AM PDT by Hischild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Some judges shouldn't be judges. Her loss was not worth $45,000 no matter how you explain it. What's the hidden relationship here?


9 posted on 05/09/2005 6:59:20 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hischild

However, if it's something, or one, you care deeply about, then why not?


10 posted on 05/09/2005 7:00:14 AM PDT by dionyza (Fortuna favorat audax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece
Good! And I hope she pursues aggressive collection procedures, including (but not limited to) ex parte' garnishment of bank accounts, seizure of real property, and (my personal favorite) getting a court order to enter the debtor's house with a sheriff's deputy to inventory non-exempt property.

The nice thing about garnishment of people's bank accounts is that the bank tacks on a service charge of about $400 per garnishment. Yes, it comes out of the debtor's account and is not counted as part of the satisfaction of the judgment.

Make the debtor's life pure, unmitigated Hell.

11 posted on 05/09/2005 7:00:16 AM PDT by neutrino (Globalization “is the economic treason that dare not speak its name.” (173))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

The inmates are running the assylum.


12 posted on 05/09/2005 7:01:24 AM PDT by bboop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

I'm glad a judge at least understood that the cat had value to the owner...and that the idiot with the dog was responsible for the destruction of someone elses 'item of value'.

Hrmpt,
as for birds,
check out what a Black Palm or Major Mitchell's Cockatoo is going for these days ;)


13 posted on 05/09/2005 7:01:49 AM PDT by najida (Living in my house with just a power cord, a garden hose & a bucket; what else does a girl need ; ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
Insane.

Literally. Anyone who "keeps two urns with ashes of beloved pets" is certifiable as a mental case. IMO.

14 posted on 05/09/2005 7:02:16 AM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece; MeekOneGOP
VK ping? ~


15 posted on 05/09/2005 7:02:56 AM PDT by Zacs Mom (Proud wife of a Marine! ... and purveyor of "rampant, unedited dialogue")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dionyza
Or a parrot? Hamster? Child?

Do you seriously value a child the same as a hampster or a parrot? If so, you are insane.

16 posted on 05/09/2005 7:03:40 AM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: najida
I'm glad a judge at least understood that the cat had value to the owner

I think it's the size of the value that's appalling, not just the fact of the existence of a value attached to a cat.

17 posted on 05/09/2005 7:06:37 AM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece
Gray did not appear in court for the case and was not represented by a lawyer, Karp said.

They better be very certain that they have proof of serving the papers to him.

That aside, NO CAT IS WORTH $45K . The cat was 13 years old and would have died soon anyways.

18 posted on 05/09/2005 7:10:14 AM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PetroniDE; Slings and Arrows; Lady Jag

19 posted on 05/09/2005 7:17:24 AM PDT by martin_fierro (See what I did there?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece
Where did the dog kill the cat?? Was the free roaming cat(s) in the dogs yard?

My neighbor lets his cats roam around the neighborhood killing birds - that I love - with immunity. Ask me if I like it!

20 posted on 05/09/2005 7:20:52 AM PDT by sandydipper (Less government is best government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece
Image hosted by Photobucket.com Score one for the Cats!
21 posted on 05/09/2005 7:32:22 AM PDT by ßuddaßudd (7 days - 7 ways)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sandydipper

Well, sue him. In Seattle. You could retire.


22 posted on 05/09/2005 7:35:38 AM PDT by bboop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sandydipper

Well, sue him. In Seattle. You could retire.


23 posted on 05/09/2005 7:35:48 AM PDT by bboop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dionyza
And if it was a smaller dog being mauled, would you still say, 'these things happen'? Or a parrot? Hamster? Child?

I would say that mentally and spiritually balanced people understand the difference between an animal and a child.

Animals are not human beings and people that treat animals like human beings are mentally or spiritually out of balance.

Nevertheless animals have value, whether for food, work, or companionship.

24 posted on 05/09/2005 7:39:36 AM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dionyza
A parrot is a hamster is a child?

Peter Singer would be happy.

25 posted on 05/09/2005 7:46:31 AM PDT by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

I live in this stupid state....please pray for me....LOL.


26 posted on 05/09/2005 7:48:18 AM PDT by ThisLittleLightofMine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece
Gray did not appear in court for the case and was not represented by a lawyer, Karp said.

Gray insulted the judge....and the judges union...

cased closed

This is the real reason he got stomped on so hard

The judge could care less about old ladies or cats

imo

27 posted on 05/09/2005 7:54:24 AM PDT by joesnuffy (The generation that survived the depression and won WW2 proved poverty does not cause crime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Wonder what the judges cut was? Would love to see a few more of her non-biased cases.


28 posted on 05/09/2005 8:23:52 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece
Well, just a few weeks back, my neighbors dog came after my wife's Persian cat. Cat was on a harness/leash (I control my pets so they do not trespass or kill wildlife) sitting in the flowerbed my wife and I were gardening in at the time. Dog came at a dead run for the cat, who did a pretty good job evading, considering he (the cat) was on a leash.

I literally had to chase the dog/cat furball around until I got a hold of the dog. I proceeded to bounce the dog's skull off the driveway a few times, while being bitten. I had gardening gloves on, so I was lucky.

The cat in question was the gift I gave to my wife for our engagement (happily married for 12 years now). I was an impoverished graduate student back then and could not afford any diamond ring, so the cat (which she adores) was the very best I could give her.

To say the pet has sentimental value would be an understatement. I warned my neighbor that a repeat event like that would cost him more than he could afford. Yes, I know that cats kill birds and dogs kill cats. Well, where I come from, people shoot and kill dogs who come on their property. Since the folks where I currently live frown on that, I'll guess I'll have to rely on a lawyer.

29 posted on 05/09/2005 8:24:34 AM PDT by Panzerfaust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dionyza

You can't always control the uncontrollable and it's not always the fault of the owner.


30 posted on 05/09/2005 8:29:26 AM PDT by kx9088
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

If the dog had a tendency to get loose and enter her property, she probably should have locked her cat up for a few days and set out some poison.


31 posted on 05/09/2005 8:29:41 AM PDT by LanPB01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece
You can buy cats at the pet store for less than $100. Since this was a special cat to her, award $500 so she can get the breed she wants.

Anything more is theft and insane. The judge should be removed as he is obviously mentally incompetant

32 posted on 05/09/2005 8:43:32 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom; 4mycountry; TheBigB; VRWCmember; Zavien Doombringer; jriemer; mhking; glock rocks; ...
Rest in peace, Yofi. :(

Ping for da kitties.

And sorry for all the pings today, guys.

I'll try to keep the pings down today, if I can. :)


Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my Viking Kitty/ZOT ping list!. . .don't be shy.


33 posted on 05/09/2005 8:46:00 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: neutrino
the cat was property and the owner should be reimbursed the exact amount she had it insured for up to $500. (as no cat is worth more than that)

Judgements like this are what lead to little old ladies houses being burned down. After all if the innocent dog owner (he didn't kill the cat after all) has his life ruined for a minor animal control violation he may as well take someone down with him.

I mean it's not like he shot the property.

34 posted on 05/09/2005 8:46:05 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Panzerfaust
the dog came on your property? It must be yours. Take it for a nice long ride out to the country (or better yet the middle of the big city) a hundred miles or so away and drop it off at the animal shelter. (or off a bridge, I'm easy) Problem solved
35 posted on 05/09/2005 8:47:38 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP

Meek it seems as if there is a lot of going on. So, I understand the high volume of pings.


36 posted on 05/09/2005 8:50:03 AM PDT by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (People too weak to follow their own dreams, will always find a way to discourage yours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: neutrino

And if she tries to enter his house, I hope he uses his second amendment rights. This woman and judge are wackos.


37 posted on 05/09/2005 8:51:04 AM PDT by DLfromthedesert (Texas Cowboy...you da man!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: John O

I am so sick and tired of lawsuit awards being calculated to "send a message". Damages should be based on facts period. Slimy lawyers and now judges who keep wanting to "send a message" are using emotion instead of facts, and in the worst subjective way.


38 posted on 05/09/2005 8:54:36 AM PDT by winner3000 (part)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Hischild
Excuse me, but I would hardly classify a child with a parrot, hamster, or cat.

You're right. To many the child is not worth as much as the others.

39 posted on 05/09/2005 9:02:59 AM PDT by SlowBoat407 (The last of the grammar sticklers - or the first of their return.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

40 posted on 05/09/2005 9:04:01 AM PDT by MarineBrat (Politicians and diapers have one thing in common. They need changing often, and for the same reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

This isn't justice. The judge is looney.


41 posted on 05/09/2005 9:12:49 AM PDT by planekT (Go DeLay, Go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick
Thank you. :)

42 posted on 05/09/2005 9:13:48 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Greer?


43 posted on 05/09/2005 9:38:11 AM PDT by ChefKeith (Apply here to be added to the NASCAR Ping List, Daytona is done but we got 27 more races to go...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece
"due in part to my negligence.... I'm sorry she lost her cat, but I had no control over it...

So.... which is it?

44 posted on 05/09/2005 9:57:03 AM PDT by SandyInSeattle (Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Pajama Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DLfromthedesert
And if she tries to enter his house, I hope he uses his second amendment rights. This woman and judge are wackos.

Please notice that my posting presumed a lawful court order, being executed by a law enforcement officer. Perhaps you should reconsider your position, as some might interpret it as advocating something you surely do not mean to suggest.

45 posted on 05/09/2005 9:57:40 AM PDT by neutrino (Globalization “is the economic treason that dare not speak its name.” (173))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

I like cats. But I know of no cat worth that much money.


46 posted on 05/09/2005 10:02:36 AM PDT by SolidRedState (E Pluribus Funk --- (Latin taglines are sooooo cool! Don't ya think?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John O
the cat was property and the owner should be reimbursed the exact amount she had it insured for up to $500. (as no cat is worth more than that)

Clearly, the court disagreed. I applaud the court's decision.

Judgements like this are what lead to little old ladies houses being burned down.

Are you suggesting that the dog owner would engage in criminal activities such as arson and attempted murder? I wouldn't doubt it.

After all if the innocent dog owner (he didn't kill the cat after all) has his life ruined for a minor animal control violation he may as well take someone down with him.

No, not innocent. Rather, guilty of negligence, an established legal concept.

Furthermore, were he to decide to "take someone down with him", it would indicate that he had latent criminal tendencies. Why coddle such potential murderers?

I mean it's not like he shot the property.

So, if a drunk driver passed out at the wheel, and his car smashed into your nearest and dearest, you would advocate that he be excused? After all, he didn't consciously kill them - he was asleep at the wheel.

No, the court decided wisely. I do hope that the judgment is executed diligently.

47 posted on 05/09/2005 10:05:23 AM PDT by neutrino (Globalization “is the economic treason that dare not speak its name.” (173))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: All

Sheesh this guy is lucky... this cat owner went to court instead of hiring a hit man or something... LOL

I know several old ladies..including my mom (88yrs old) who would have beat the dog and dog owner to death with her walking stick.. :o)


48 posted on 05/09/2005 10:09:25 AM PDT by Tungenchek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: John O
the dog came on your property? It must be yours. Take it for a nice long ride out to the country (or better yet the middle of the big city) a hundred miles or so away and drop it off at the animal shelter. (or off a bridge, I'm easy) Problem solved

Does that also follow for children? How about endangered species? The UPS truck?

49 posted on 05/09/2005 10:10:15 AM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece; Slings and Arrows; Glenn; quantim; republicangel; Bahbah; Beaker; ...
Kitty justice ping!
---
Kitty Ping List alert!

[Freepmail me to get on or off the Kitty Ping List.]

50 posted on 05/09/2005 10:11:10 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows ("You would have to double your IQ to be stupid. " --zip)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson