Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dan from Michigan; Travis McGee
New York state countered by arguing that the Second Amendment is only a guarantee to the states of "the collective right to fortify their respective 'well regulated' militias."

This is so outrageous. It is impossible to reconcile the fact that the courts read:

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,...."

and find a right guaranteed to individuals and then read:

"the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

and find a right guaranteed only to the states.

10 posted on 05/10/2005 10:47:50 PM PDT by ConservativeLawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeLawyer; adam_az; American in Israel; Ancesthntr; aragorn; archy; Badray; buccaneer81; ..
New York state countered by arguing that the Second Amendment is only a guarantee to the states of "the collective right to fortify their respective 'well regulated' militias."

Is that so....hmmmm....


16 posted on 05/10/2005 11:40:10 PM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeLawyer

Only a gun hating liberal could read the same word in the same context and come up with different meaning. I hope this goes to appeal.


79 posted on 05/11/2005 7:42:37 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson