Skip to comments.
Federal judge rules gay marriage ban unconstitutional (Nebraska)
Omaha World Herald ^
| 5/12/05
| Todd Cooper
Posted on 05/12/2005 1:32:13 PM PDT by jebanks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-189 next last
1
posted on
05/12/2005 1:32:15 PM PDT
by
jebanks
To: jebanks
NO!!!!!! The people of Nebraska voted for this!
YOU LIBERAL TYRANT!!!!!!!!!!!!
THE PEOPLE VOTED!!!!!!!!!!
YOU CANNOT UNDERMINE THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THIS JUDGE MUST BE IMPEACHED NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
To: jebanks
Here it comes, as predicted.
To: jebanks
Betcha he's a Clinton Nominee! We need a list of all the judges who've ruled "against the mainstream" on the liberal side and send it up to Washington to have made into a CHART for those damn senators!
To: jebanks
I would love to read the actually ruling on this. Why don't we all just give up and tell the homosexuals that they win. Take over our schools and tell our kids homosexuality is wonderful and leads to a happy, fulfilling life. Let them get married and live happily ever after. We are wasting our time trying to fight. We are obviously losing.
5
posted on
05/12/2005 1:35:00 PM PDT
by
mlc9852
To: jebanks
Liberal federal judge just invalidated Nebraska's state constitutional ban on gay marriage. Expect the SCOTUS to invalidate ALL state constitutional bans on gay marriage. The federal judiciary is out of control. We need to abolish judicial review!
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
6
posted on
05/12/2005 1:35:33 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: jebanks
No surprise hear. That's what liberals do, sooner or later they find their judge.
7
posted on
05/12/2005 1:35:36 PM PDT
by
JZelle
To: princess leah
U.S. District Judge Joseph Bataillon was nominated to the bench in January of 1997 and confirmed by the Senate nearly 10 months later.
8
posted on
05/12/2005 1:36:15 PM PDT
by
kcvl
To: jebanks
I predicted this long ago. The
ONLY way to put a stop to this nonsense is through the ratification of a Federal Marriage Amendment.
Period.
9
posted on
05/12/2005 1:36:24 PM PDT
by
B Knotts
(Viva il Papa!)
To: goldstategop
Everyone e-mail their Senators now. Joseph Bataillon MUST BE IMPEACHED!!!! WE MUST NOT ALLOW THIS TYRANNY!!!!!!!!!!!
To: jebanks
"U.S. District Judge Joseph Bataillon was nominated to the bench in January of 1997 and confirmed by the Senate nearly 10 months later."
Clinton appointee. Why am I not surprised?
To: mikeus_maximus
12
posted on
05/12/2005 1:37:49 PM PDT
by
KC_Conspirator
(This space outsourced to India)
To: jebanks
6/2/2003
U.S. District Judge Joseph Bataillon issued a midnight order temporarily restraining the U.S. Department of Agriculture from shutting down Nebraska Beef Company in Omaha for alleged violation of meat safety rules.
13
posted on
05/12/2005 1:37:59 PM PDT
by
kcvl
To: wk4bush2004
All hail KING COURT!
14
posted on
05/12/2005 1:38:01 PM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: jebanks
The DemoRats pucker everytime this issue comes up. This is one they just can't win. The more it is in the news the better for the GOP.
15
posted on
05/12/2005 1:38:11 PM PDT
by
txkev
To: jebanks
Question: If I was an employee of the State of Nebraska (a guy can dream can't he) could I share benefits with someone who was just a good friend?
To: goldstategop
We need to appoint better judges. Judicial Review is right out of the Federalist Papers.
17
posted on
05/12/2005 1:38:19 PM PDT
by
Borges
To: goldstategop
I thought I read somewhere that if a State Constitution is amended the courts could not challenge. Something about States rights where the State Const is concerned.
Was I mistaken and can this be appealed to the USSC?
18
posted on
05/12/2005 1:38:28 PM PDT
by
JoeV1
(Democrat Party-The unlawful and corrupt leading the blind and uneducated)
To: mikeus_maximus
Well, this could be the spark to get conservatives angry enough to stop the judicial madness and put and end to the judicial tyranny. This judge is a modern day Roland Freiseler.
19
posted on
05/12/2005 1:40:07 PM PDT
by
KC_Conspirator
(This space outsourced to India)
To: B Knotts
Its not just gay marriage. This judge's ruling strengthen the case for a constitutional amendment abolishing judicial review. When a single judge takes it on himself to disregard the views of 70% of the voters in the American heartland, we are heading for a constitutional crisis. I stated yesterday my conviction judges have no business deciding questions of a social or political nature. Their only duty ought to be to see how the law is enforced and to punish offenders.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
20
posted on
05/12/2005 1:40:24 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-189 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson