Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court to rehear bartender's lipstick lawsuit (Coyote Ugly?)
Reuters ^ | May 13, 2005

Posted on 05/16/2005 9:41:59 AM PDT by new cruelty

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A federal appeals court agreed on Friday to reconsider the case of a female bartender who was fired from her job at a Nevada casino for refusing to wear lipstick, blush and other make-up. Alleging sex discrimination, Darlene Jespersen sued her employer, Harrah's Entertainment Inc., after it dismissed her in 2000 for refusing to comply with a policy that required women to wear makeup.

In December, Jespersen's case was dismissed by a three-judge panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, which said the policy was legal. Without comment, the court reversed the ruling on Friday and ordered the case to be reheard by an 11-judge panel.

Jespersen's attorney said the case of the 20-year Harrah's veteran could determine the rights of women in service professions to choose how to present themselves.

"What makes it discriminatory is that it requires women to present themselves in a particularly feminine way," said the attorney, Jennifer Pizer of Lambda Legal in Los Angeles.

Jespersen started work at Harrah's in 1979 as a dishwasher before being promoted to work as a bartender helper and then as a full bartender. Jespersen felt deeply uncomfortable wearing the foundation, lip stick, blush and mascara that her employer required, her attorney said.

Harrah's implemented a mandatory policy that it called "Beverage Department Image Transformation," which required, among other things, that women wear makeup. After refusing to comply with the policy, Jespersen was fired in 2000.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: freedomofassociation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

1 posted on 05/16/2005 9:42:00 AM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: new cruelty

Bow wow. Or Popo Bawa.


2 posted on 05/16/2005 9:44:38 AM PDT by thag (Vegetables: What My Dinner Had For Lunch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
Darlene Jespersen

Why do I get the feeling that she changed her name from Darlene Jesman.

3 posted on 05/16/2005 9:45:09 AM PDT by martin_fierro (A v v n c v l v s M a x i m v s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty

I don't necessarily agree with the policy, but if she didn't need it, I doubt that they would have mentioned it.


4 posted on 05/16/2005 9:45:10 AM PDT by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty

"Beverage Department Image Transformation,"

Had a few of those myself but it wasn't mandatory.


5 posted on 05/16/2005 9:46:05 AM PDT by Leg Olam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

Maybe someone has a picture of her...


6 posted on 05/16/2005 9:46:11 AM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty

You've been around here long enough to know that posts like these REQUIRE a photograph. Now go stand in a corner for 2 minutes and contemplate your error.


7 posted on 05/16/2005 9:48:40 AM PDT by bigfootbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
This is what the women's movement has been reduced to? And I thought the lowest possible point was when FEMINIST ridiculed then Secretary of State, now representative Katherine Harris for wearing too much make-up.

My question, what does the women's movement have against looking good???? (and I say this as a female)
8 posted on 05/16/2005 9:49:17 AM PDT by IMissPresidentReagan ("My Friends we did it....we made a difference. ...All in all not bad, not bad at all." Pres. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty

http://www.nevadalabor.com/barbwire/barb00/barb10-8-00.html


9 posted on 05/16/2005 9:49:48 AM PDT by TrueBlueAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
Here are a few from google-

At first blush, she looks like a normal person.

If I'm hanging out at Harrah's, the last thing I would be concerned about is if this woman was wearing lipstick.

10 posted on 05/16/2005 9:50:04 AM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bigfootbob

LOL. See my previous post for a picture. I hope you're happy!


11 posted on 05/16/2005 9:51:12 AM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All

What happens when Bozo the clown decides he doesn't want to wear makeup?


12 posted on 05/16/2005 9:55:13 AM PDT by TXFireman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

"Oh mah darlene oh mah darlene oh mah darlene jesperson...."


13 posted on 05/16/2005 9:56:36 AM PDT by NRA1995 (John Edwards: "Mah daddy worked in a MEEL")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bigfootbob
Warning. . .Here she is . . .





14 posted on 05/16/2005 9:57:11 AM PDT by IMissPresidentReagan ("My Friends we did it....we made a difference. ...All in all not bad, not bad at all." Pres. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty

Dude looks like a dude


15 posted on 05/16/2005 9:59:08 AM PDT by sully777 (If anyone asks, I'm a monger-monger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: IMissPresidentReagan

She is a square peg to someone's round hole, fer sure. And here I thought the mullet was dead.


16 posted on 05/16/2005 10:01:59 AM PDT by sully777 (If anyone asks, I'm a monger-monger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
Lady the discrimination was there when they hired you and other "good looking" women over a man, or the older, or the ugly, to bartend

Being a nice looking women was a reality of the job in a bar and cocktail work that you had no problem exploiting to your advantage to get ... wear your damm makeup and look nice ...that was a major part of your job talent that got you hired over the others... and they will help you get the bigger tips

17 posted on 05/16/2005 10:03:40 AM PDT by tophat9000 (When the State ASSUMES death...It makes an ASH out of you and me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IMissPresidentReagan

Some faces even lipstick can't help.....


18 posted on 05/16/2005 10:04:42 AM PDT by NRA1995 (John Edwards: "Mah daddy worked in a MEEL")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
lipstick, blush and other make-up couldnt hurt:


19 posted on 05/16/2005 10:04:46 AM PDT by capydick ("The current tax code is a daily mugging." --Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
"What makes it discriminatory is that it requires women to present themselves in a particularly feminine way," said the attorney...

Does this mean if an employer requires me to present themselves in a particularly feminine way that would be okay?

20 posted on 05/16/2005 10:08:17 AM PDT by PeoplesRepublicOfWashington (Re-elect Dino Rossi in 2005!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson