But he isn't being pleasured by the girls. It is a man's hand.
In any event - if he can only get aroused through imagery and not the real thing, then he's handicapped and impotent.
His love is in the sink.
I know you guys that are into porn don't like hearing this.
But face it - you're pervs.
And, don't knock the homos: You are closer to being one than you think.
So any guy that has ever masturbated has had a homosexual experience?
I am not defending porn, however I don't think we can make the leap that men would rather watch porn, or can only get aroused with porn. Wouldn't it me more logical to assume that they watch it because human intercourse is not willing or available? I mean wouldn't everybody rather have human intercourse than watch porn? It is kind of like going to the kitchen cabinet and finding out the potato chips are all gone so you have a bowl of ceral instead. Mush rather have the potato chips but since there aren't any might as well have a bowl of ceral, fills you up at least.
I can't see porn as a FIRST choice of gratification.
I agree. If a guy can't get aroused for a real woman, he clearly has problems.
I know you guys that are into porn don't like hearing this. But face it - you're pervs.
I disagree. A pervert is generally considered to be someone whose behavior deviates from what is acceptable when it comes to sexual behavior. A large percentage of Americans use porn at least occasionally. Therefore, porn use is common enough not to qualify as a perversion.
And, don't knock the homos: You are closer to being one than you think.
I don't knock homosexuals. I have no problems with them. However, I do not find men sexually arousing so I'm not close to homosexuals in that regard.