Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boomtown USA
CNNMoney ^ | 5/23/2005 | Stephen Gandel

Posted on 05/25/2005 2:09:58 PM PDT by Rutles4Ever

NEW YORK (MONEY Magazine) - Twenty-four-year-old Kelly Pearson says the $580,000 ranch-style house she bought near downtown San Diego last August is a dream come true.

It is nice: 1,450 square feet, four bedrooms, two baths, crown molding, a big kitchen with an island and -- quick! duck! -- a 737 jet descending upon her roof with what feels like 10 feet to spare.

With no savings, and a college loan to repay, Pearson took out a mortgage for 100 percent of the price of the house. Closing costs were paid for by a $10,000 gift from her parents (money first earmarked for her wedding).

--SNIP--

The rub is that fewer and fewer San Diegans have a standard mortgage. According to PMI Mortgage Insurance Co., more than two-thirds of the loans to buy homes here last year were interest-only mortgages, which have much lower monthly payments but much bigger bills to pay down the road. (See "The Miracle Mortgage.")

--SNIP--

What's more, 40 percent of the 18,400 net new jobs (jobs created minus jobs lost) in San Diego last year were in construction and real estate, reports the State of California.

This raises the risk that any downturn in housing prices could cascade through the economy. Falling prices would translate into lower incomes for all those people working in real estate, which means less for them to spend on homes, which would depress prices further. A nasty cycle.

(Excerpt) Read more at money.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bubble; pop; realestate; sandiego
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-174 next last
To: k2blader
The value of the security was rising dramatically, so the bank was far less likely to lose the value of the security allowing for turnover time and sales costs.

Lenders tend to compute the amount of the required down payment on a loan so that will be a bit less than the unpaid interest on the value of the loan during the period between onset of non-payment of the loan and resale of the house after repossession, plus sale costs. The former protects them from the latter. They make their profit on the mortgage points.

But in this market home prices are rising so fast, and predictably, that at least for the period in question the projected increase in the home's value during the period between "onset of non-payment of the loan and resale of the house after repossession" will exceed lost interest on the principal in that time plus sales costs, i.e., the projected increase in the home's value in the next six months serves the same lender purpose as 10% down payment.

61 posted on 05/25/2005 4:52:16 PM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: A message
Take your wife back there for a Christmas vacation. Make her do all the driving while visiting, help your relatives with the grocery shopping, introduce her to storm windows, etc.

My Pittsburg-area grandparents (Valencia) loved to visit their children in California for the winter. One of my friends freaked out when he heard my grandmother tell my grandfather that it was March and so time to go home to start the spring plowing. He realized she wasn't joking.

My father took us back there one winter and I did not like Pennsylvania winter at all. I was born and raised in the San Francisco Bay Area (western Marin County plus Burlingame in San Mateo County), where it never got below 40 F or over 90 F, and rarely over 80 F.

62 posted on 05/25/2005 5:00:00 PM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
I hear Ya, My retirering parents bought a real nice home in Palm Springs(No Pool) for $289.000 in April 2004, That house is now worth $389,000, Hell I am a first time Home Owner as of DEC 2002, My Lil Shack on a creek has gone up $55,000.
63 posted on 05/25/2005 5:00:23 PM PDT by cmsgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Thud
minor increase allowed for inflation

Max = 2%/yr.

64 posted on 05/25/2005 5:01:22 PM PDT by AlBondigas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: johnnycap

Good Story, One of my good friends bought in a iffy part of Costa Mesa,CA for $300,000 in "99 sold at $585,000 in 04, and moved to Oregon laughing all the way to the bank.


65 posted on 05/25/2005 5:05:32 PM PDT by cmsgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

Sell.


66 posted on 05/25/2005 5:10:43 PM PDT by international american (Tagline now flameproof....purchased from "Conspiracy Guy Custom Taglines"LLC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: johnnycap
The R.E. mkt is definitely "out of equilibrium" & is unsustainable.(40% overpriced ?)

A couple pt. rise in interest rates combined w/ the "interest only" & other funny loans will crash this mkt - big time.

Combine above w/ funny biz at Fannie Mae & HOLD ON, it'll be the roughest ride since '29 !

67 posted on 05/25/2005 5:11:39 PM PDT by AlBondigas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: international american

If we were going to move out of state, that would be a great idea.

In state, what's the good reason?


68 posted on 05/25/2005 5:13:18 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: cmsgop

"Good Story, One of my good friends bought in a iffy part of Costa Mesa,CA for $300,000 in "99 sold at $585,000 in 04, and moved to Oregon laughing all the way to the bank."

-Nothing wrong with a good game of musical chairs, I just don't think its good strategy to join the game just as the music stops. God bless your friend. God help his buyer.


69 posted on 05/25/2005 5:13:28 PM PDT by johnnycap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

"We bought 2 heavily wooded acres on Lake James with 407 feet of shoreline in Western NC, nestled in the Blue Ridge mountains and built a 4,200 sq. ft. brick house, built a gazebo, dock, etc. Total cost... $650,000. "

Sounds like heaven......and WORTH 650!


70 posted on 05/25/2005 5:16:47 PM PDT by international american (Tagline now flameproof....purchased from "Conspiracy Guy Custom Taglines"LLC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: johnnycap
The house is probably at least 50-60 years old and, from your description, has such structural problems that it might be effectively a tear-down. If there is a significant hillside nearby ("dozens of steps up from the street" is ominous), there might be a ground "creep" problem in that area too so the boundaries might have moved - not just yours, but everyone's. That won't show up on a title report - a new survey is required.

Ground "creep" is a really slow motion landslide over an extended period - say an inch a year for 50+ years. A whole neighborhood can move almost as a unit. This causes incredible title problems.

I used to practice real estate law and have a friend who is a soil engineer.

71 posted on 05/25/2005 5:17:35 PM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

-If you have decided to stay, there is no reason to sell
other than to make a mint, and rent until the market crashes, and crash it will.


72 posted on 05/25/2005 5:19:32 PM PDT by international american (Tagline now flameproof....purchased from "Conspiracy Guy Custom Taglines"LLC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
As long as she doesn't miss a payment the bank can't ask her to cough up any extra money, IMO.

I went through this in Sacramento in the 90's. Bought my home at the peak of market in May of 90. California enters recession. Home values crater. Leave in 97, home now worth less then equity in home would lose 20% if sold. Rent 2 years sell for sl loss but not bad ( admit if I could have held on for 4 more years would have turned a profit).

Even worse were friends who bought with 5% down. They would have had to write huge check to bank when they were leaving. Just tossed the bank the keys and walked away. Lots of people did the same, making a glut on the market of homes held by banks. This further depressed home price. And that situation was not nearly as crazy as the bubble going on now.
73 posted on 05/25/2005 5:24:53 PM PDT by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

With all due respect, "carping" will never repeal the Laws of Supply and Demand.

The great state of California and its uncounted subsidiary "governmental" bodies tasked with "overseeing" and "managing" growth in California have succeeded in restricting the construction of new houses in California.

The unsurprising result: the price of housing has gone UP.

If Californians really want "affordable housing", they will have to abandon the "romantic" (albeit naive) belief that wilderness is "good", that development is "bad" and that the "public interest" in "protecting wilderness" must supersede the rights of individual landowners to build and sell what the public wants to buy.

I wonder if any California FReepers would be willing to challenge the conventional "wisdom" on this point?


74 posted on 05/25/2005 5:26:47 PM PDT by pfony1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ops33
I hate to tell her that my wife and I are buying a brand new house, 2200 square feet, 2 car garage, 3 beds, 2 1/2 baths, granite counter tops, tumbled marble in the kitchen and master bath, jacuzzi tub, double vanity in both baths, zoned dual fuel heat pumps, regular oven, convective oven, built in microwave, (it goes on), on 5 acres for 219K.

So, about $100/sf. This is exactly what I keep saying on these threads, this is the price of building new, anywhere. Land is extra.

For people in flyover country, its hard to understand California real estate but as others have already mentioned, this is the way of things - boom/bust cycles that last quite a long time and things are no different now, despite the hyperventilating from Freepers who don't know that historical returns for CA real estate are close to 7% per year, long term. People forget that for 7-8 years, the real estate market was in the tank here and 3 good years doesn't make a bubble in that sort of context. The next market bust could last just as long.

75 posted on 05/25/2005 5:29:35 PM PDT by Citizen of the Savage Nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: pfony1
Go here:
http://www.vdare.com/sailer/050508_family.htm

May 08, 2005
"Affordable Family Formation"—The Neglected Key To GOP's Future
By Steve Sailer

76 posted on 05/25/2005 5:31:26 PM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Citizen of the Savage Nation

I'm tracking foreclosures in NJ on my blog. I haven't figured out if the upturn in foreclosures over the past few weeks is a trend or if its a normal seasonal pattern.

http://shorebubble.blogspot.com/


77 posted on 05/25/2005 5:32:35 PM PDT by junkbond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Thud

"Ground "creep" is a really slow motion landslide over an extended period - say an inch a year for 50+ years. A whole neighborhood can move almost as a unit. This causes incredible title problems."

-You make it sound like I dodged a $950,000 bullet. Interestingly enough, I don't think we have had THE BIG ONE yet in California. What happens to all this high priced real estate when a 9.5 Earthquake hits the bay area?


78 posted on 05/25/2005 5:35:07 PM PDT by johnnycap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Thud
LOL - good suggestion. I spent the first 40 years of my life in New England, and when I was a kid, loved the snowy and icy winters (no school - woohoo!).

Reaching adulthood, it was a different story - they didn't call off work when the snow hit (one exception - Blizzard of '78, work was called off for one day, my kids didn't have school for a week!).The last winter I was in New England was an "ice year" - not a lot of snow, because it was a rather warm winter, but cold enough for sleet and freezing rain. Beautiful to look at at night out the window with a warm, cozy fire in the fireplace, but ugh - nasty stuff to have to drive to work in early in the morning, or at night.

Now, after 21 years on the Central Coast of California, as much as I still miss, and always will, the beautiful green, rolling hills of New England, I honestly don't think I'd ever be able to live there again. I still don't take for granted that I can walk out to the backyard in my bare feet in January.

79 posted on 05/25/2005 5:37:16 PM PDT by Inspectorette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: AlBondigas
The R.E. mkt is definitely "out of equilibrium" & is unsustainable.(40% overpriced ?)

Maybe in California and a few other hot spots, but most of the country hasn't seen this crazy spike in prices. Average American has 56.1% equity in their home. A few areas will see prices tank, most of country won't notice.

80 posted on 05/25/2005 5:44:55 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (If you agree with Karl Marx, the AFL-CIO and E.P.I. please stop calling yourself a conservative!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-174 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson