Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Crackingham
"Individuals have no 'fundamental' constitutional right to smoke tobacco," the judge wrote.

And the judge has no fundamental understanding of the constitution, much less rights.

This is past sad.

37 posted on 05/26/2005 8:24:02 AM PDT by Protagoras (The goal is power, the tool is deceit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Protagoras

Setting aside the issue of wheteher one has the right to smoke or not for a moment - what about the "rights" of a PRIVATE club on private property?

I agree with your conclusion regarding said judge.


38 posted on 05/26/2005 8:27:28 AM PDT by Gabz (My give-a-damn is busted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson