To: Crackingham
"Individuals have no 'fundamental' constitutional right to smoke tobacco," the judge wrote. And the judge has no fundamental understanding of the constitution, much less rights.
This is past sad.
37 posted on
05/26/2005 8:24:02 AM PDT by
Protagoras
(The goal is power, the tool is deceit.)
To: Protagoras
Setting aside the issue of wheteher one has the right to smoke or not for a moment - what about the "rights" of a PRIVATE club on private property?
I agree with your conclusion regarding said judge.
38 posted on
05/26/2005 8:27:28 AM PDT by
Gabz
(My give-a-damn is busted.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson