Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MarkL

Can't agree with you.

This is a private property issue, not a smoking ban matter.

A federal judge would be well within bounds to nix the state law under an individual's right to lawfully use his property.


80 posted on 05/26/2005 2:40:57 PM PDT by sergeantdave (Marxism has not only failed to promote human freedom, it has failed to produce food)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: sergeantdave
Can't agree with you.

This is a private property issue, not a smoking ban matter.

A fed0eral judge would be well within bounds to nix the state law under an individual's right to lawfully use his property.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but a judge has to rule on a case the way it's filed, doesn't he? If the appeal was filed as a property rights case, then he might have ruled as you see it. However, it was filed as a fundamental constitutional rights case, and the judge had to rule on that specific case.

Mark

82 posted on 05/26/2005 2:45:52 PM PDT by MarkL (I've got a fever, and the only prescription is MORE COWBELL!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson