What about the man who does trust man to keep his word, but doesn't turn his heart from Hashem?
Perhaps naively, I still have a certain feeling that Bush
dislikes the Palestinians, and feels the best way to "prove" their insincerity and lies about Israel, is to really test them by giving them their state, and then see what happens. If they then continue to attack Israel, IMO
Bush will turn Israel loose, and allow them to do whatever
they feel is needed to annihilate the Palestinian enemy.
I think Sharon has that in mind too in his strategy, and I feel sure that Sharon and Bush are pretty much in synch in
them both anticipating that scenario.
Besides, in a Democracy like America, you're generally voting for the person who you think will do the least harm, not the most good. And Hashem is not on the ballot.
During the campaign, Kerry proposed doing something similar with Iran - letting them have nuclear technology in order to "test" them - and he was roundly and justly lampooned for it around here. It was foolish for him to suggest such a thing, and foolish for Bush to do it, too.