Posted on 05/31/2005 6:45:53 AM PDT by EarthStomper
A new climate modeling study presented this week at the American Geophysical Union (AGU) meeting in New Orleans suggests that much of Africa will experience increasing drought as global warming progresses in the coming decades.
This has been the most difficult, and yet the most important, aspect of global warming to predict: how will climate change on a local and regional basis in the future? People are most affected by how weather will change where they live, not by how much the global average temperature is changing. And, on a whole, humanity is more sensitive to changes in rainfall than to temperature.
About the only thing generally agreed upon about the effect of global warming on precipitation is that it will, on average, increase somewhat (not decrease). The amount of increase is expected to be a couple of percent for every degree F of warming. But regional shifts in the usual distribution of persistently rainy and dry areas are always a possibility, just as those shifts have occurred in decades and centuries past. Natural variability in precipitation is so large that it has been difficult to measure any change in global rainfall due to the 1 degree F warming in the last 100 years.
The new study uses a computerized climate model that suggests that a predicted gradual warming of the Indian Ocean due to increasing atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations will lead to a commensurate decrease in rainfall over central and southern Africa. The Sahel region to the north (just south of the Sahara Desert), which endured decades of persistent drought until relatively recently, might actually see an increase in rainfall according to the model projections.
It is important to point out that these are model predictions, not observations; African drought does not seem to have yet become more frequent over the last 100 years, despite a modest amount of warming over that period. And model predictions of regional climate shifts have been notoriously unreliable. Finding the "fingerprint" of man-induced global warming-related precipitation changes is so difficult simply because, even without the help of mankind, droughts, floods, and climate changes happen anyway.
Which brings us to the more important question: Why has Africa always been so sensitive to drought, and the resulting famine that often accompanies it? Prosperity doesn't seem to suffer when drought strikes most other countries of the world. Los Angeles is often in a persistent state of drought, and we don't hear of starvation there.
The answer, of course, resides in the government controlled economies of much of Africa. A lack of personal property rights, free markets, and free trade between countries will continue to make Africa sensitive to the whims of Mother Nature, with or without the help of mankind.
This is the tragedy of Africa. We can expect this new climate study to be cited as a reason for reducing greenhouse gas emissions to help "save" the poor of the world. But in reality, what is really needed is political and economic change -- in a word, freedom. Africans need to be allowed to create their own wealth, and trade that wealth (goods, services... including food) with other countries. Creation of wealth requires access to affordable energy, which helps drive vibrant economies. Somehow, the corrupt and economically misguided governments of Africa need to be held accountable for the human suffering they are causing.
Droughts and floods will continue to occur as they always have. Only now, we can expect humans to be increasingly blamed for their existence -- a charge that will be difficult, if not impossible to prove. In the meantime, we should work to make individual countries less susceptible to weather changes, since drought in one location will be inevitably accompanied by increased rainfall in others. We must encourage the spread of freedom, for in this simple word is found not only relief for today's sufferings, but the hope for new energy technologies that will inevitably be devised by the educated and prosperous countries of the world.
That is what they used to do. Now they guard the borders and turn the people back to starve.
So far "global warming" has been responsible for higher temperatures, cooler weather, less rain, more rain, lower back pain, irregularity, psoriasis, etc. If the "solutions" to the problem weren't designed to punish the United States they may, just may, be worth considering.
All this is doing is laying the groundwork so the U.S. can be blamed for future famines in Africa. This in spite of the fact that there hasn't been a natural famine in the world for decades, if not centuries. All of the famines have been politically induced as a method of population loyalty and control. There has always been an abundance of food, but totalitarian governments prevent food from being available to political opponents. This story is just deisgned by the Marxists amongst us to give more cover to the Marxist thug-ocracies that run many African nations.
In many of the countries where starvation is a national industry they don't use their borders. They just drive the "undesirables" to areas where they can't feed themselves or otherwise make sure they won't be fed.
Yes, and they rob the UN food caravans to make sure that they can't get any food. It's a good thing we have the UN. </sarcasm>
1. Some locations will see more rainfall than normal.
2. Some locations will see less rainfall than normal.
3. Some locations will see more heat than normal.
4. Some locations will see less heat than normal.
5. All changes will be blamed on global warming.
according to usa2day 2day, wolves are teaching scientists about global warming.
wolve woof, woof!
"If the "solutions" to the problem weren't designed to punish the United States they may, just may, be worth considering."
The US is already doing quite a bit to combat global warming. One of the more positive and important steps that could be taken in the near term would be to build the new nuclear power plants the President wants. That would also reduce our dependence on foreign energy.
Who has the "Not this sh!t again?"
Polar ice caps melt, causing oceans to rise. More water bad.
Africa has been experiencing increasing drought since the time the forests disappeared and man's ancestors had to learn to live on the Savannah.
>Africa will experience increasing drought as global warming progresses in the coming decades.<
It doesn't help that people cut every tree, such as they are, for firewood, so the land never has a chance to recover. In addition, look at what's happened in Zimbabwe. All it's taken is a few years without decent farming practices to plunge the breadbasket of Africa into the cycle of famine.
This is not the fault of other countries, the Africans need to look in the mirror, and quit pointing fingers at the rest of the world.
That says it all!
The 1935 Dust Bowl days were not due to Global Warming nor are these droughts - these people have never really been out of the dark ages. Tribal law and Dictators have kept them in slavery; only a few will escape these bonds, no amount of money other aid will put them on equal footing with the rest of the productive world.
How come Africa seems to be the only place in the world (besides maybe North Korea) that experiences these horrible famines? I'm thinking that maybe weather doesn't have much to do with it.
I am glad to see that Africa's 15000 year drought is ending or prehaps it is beginning. Either way I'm glad.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.