Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Seat Belt Violators Caught By Cops Wearing Night Vision Goggles
WJLA TV (Washington, DC) ^ | Thursday June 02, 2005

Posted on 06/02/2005 8:20:41 AM PDT by tgslTakoma

Edited on 06/02/2005 8:25:19 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Rockville, Md. (AP) - Maryland State Police are using a military tool in the battle against seat belt violators.

They're using night vision goggles to find people who don't buckle up after dark. Police say 40 percent of drivers don't use their seat belts at night, making the roads much more dangerous after sunset. Police in Maryland are among 13,000 agencies nationwide that are now using the goggles.

With the goggles, Police say they can see inside cars at a distance, allowing them to nail violators who might otherwise go undetected.

The new strategy is paying off. At a seat belt enforcement operation Wednesday night on Rockville Pike, officers issued at least 44 tickets for seat belt violations.

Mod note: Associated thread.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Maryland; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: bigbrother; donutwatch; leo; nannystate; nightgoggles; nightvision; revenueenhancement; seatbelt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-198 next last
To: tgslTakoma

Seat belt stops as a primary offense, in my researched opinion, are basically a new way for ploice to justify pulling over more people likely to be scofflaws in other ways. I will not understand why they do this, but people who drive without licenses, registration, insurance, under the influence, etc.. are also far less likely to be buckled up, and these other offenses can be ticketed as well on a seat-belt traffic stop and discovery.


21 posted on 06/02/2005 8:28:28 AM PDT by AbeKrieger (Islam is the virus that causes al-Qaeda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma
Local polic yesterday were using "spotters" who stood by the road with hidden radios, when they see a seat belt off they radio ahead so the cop can suck his prey dry.

I think using night vision or goggles is way past bordering on ridiculous. When are people going to stand together against this crap.

22 posted on 06/02/2005 8:28:43 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RS
Just how does the ROAD get more dangerous when some other clown dosen't put on his belt ?

Let me say off the top that I wear my seatbelt religiously and thus don't really have a dog in the seatbelt legislation fight. However, I cannot for the *life* of me figure out how not wearing a seatbelt endangers anyone else's life. If someone wants to be stupid and engage in reckless behavior that only endangers themselves, go for it.

23 posted on 06/02/2005 8:28:56 AM PDT by Terabitten (I have a duty as an AMERICAN, not a Republican. We can never put Party above Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma

I feel all warm and fuzzy knowing that the US civilian population are a testbed for advanced military grade surveillance and interdiction methods for minor offenses like not utilizing lap and shoulder restraints. Ein volk, ein reich,...


24 posted on 06/02/2005 8:29:47 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sabatino28

I hear ya.

I don't smoke, but I believe people should be allowed to harm their bodies by smoking if they wish.

I always buckle up and make sure my passengers do so as well, but if someone in the next lane isn't buckled, that isn't going to harm me any.

I wish the government would quit protecting me from me. Protect me from something else, like murderers, terrorists, illegals, or outsourcing!


25 posted on 06/02/2005 8:30:10 AM PDT by Zeppelin (Keep on FReepin' on.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Terabitten

Mega dittoes.


26 posted on 06/02/2005 8:30:16 AM PDT by Pondman88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: sabatino28
Let me get this straight....I can choose to end a pregnancy.....but I cannot choose whether or not I want to wear a seat belt.

Not only that, but you have an absolute right, affirmed by the US Supreme Court, to refuse life-saving medical treatment and to take risks with respect to your own health in your workplace. Why this precident hasn't been applied to seat-belt laws, I don't know. I was going to try it in California, but moved to New Hampshire instead which is the last state with no adult seat-belt law.

27 posted on 06/02/2005 8:30:25 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma
Police say 40 percent of drivers don't use their seat belts at night, making the roads much more dangerous after sunset.

Please explain to me how not wearing a seatbelt at any time makes the "roads more dangerous". The intent of the law is that the "roads" not be "more dangerous" to others, which is the only reason for the "Rules of the Road" comprehended by the states police power.

28 posted on 06/02/2005 8:30:44 AM PDT by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
When are people going to stand together against this crap.

As soon as someone declares that African-Americans are less likely to wear seatbelts than Caucasians, and thus these policies are de facto profiling. THEN we'll get this practice stopped.

29 posted on 06/02/2005 8:30:45 AM PDT by AbeKrieger (Islam is the virus that causes al-Qaeda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: eastforker

Now if we went to the PD and told them we would donate $250 for every illegal captured and returned to mexico we might see some genuine law enforcement.


30 posted on 06/02/2005 8:31:12 AM PDT by eastforker (Under Cover FReeper going dark(too much 24))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma

Locally here in Lodi NJ, the Bacon have implimented a stop light cop. He's at a very busy intersection(maywood Avenue, Essex Street) pulls cars out of line at the light into the parking lot right there. He seems to be doing about 10 an hour. From my understanding, the State or maybe it was the Fed, granted these departments funds to do this kind of enforcement.

I wear my seatbelt everywhere, but I think this kind of enforcement is WAY over the top. We used to call the folks engaged in this kind of behavior Highway Robbers.


31 posted on 06/02/2005 8:31:42 AM PDT by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AbeKrieger

Sadly, you may be correct.


32 posted on 06/02/2005 8:32:36 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Terabitten
What an absolute, utter waste of police resources.

Oh, no. That's not the case at all, unless you think that the purpose of police is to prevent crime. As a profit center, on the other hand, this is police time and money well spent...or well invested, if you prefer.

33 posted on 06/02/2005 8:32:54 AM PDT by Oberon (What does it take to make government shrink?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Terabitten

Not at all........they are simply protecting the insurance industry and keeping the high priced injury and death claims down.....but I do wish someone would introduce legislation requiring everyone to buy my goods and services..........


34 posted on 06/02/2005 8:33:21 AM PDT by clearsight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma
time to change my seat belt fabric...
35 posted on 06/02/2005 8:33:42 AM PDT by Rakkasan1 (The MRS wanted to go to an expensive place to eat so I took her to the gas station.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma

It is truly sad that police resources are being wasted on nanny statism. But since nearly every candidate presented by either major party is a nanny statist proponent of reactionary legislation and revenue enhancing initiatives, it's not a surprise.


36 posted on 06/02/2005 8:35:16 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma

What a waste of tax payers money. I have noticed some police love to pretend they are in the military.


37 posted on 06/02/2005 8:35:28 AM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma

Like there isn't enough real crime in Maryland.......


38 posted on 06/02/2005 8:36:53 AM PDT by tahotdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terabitten
What an absolute, utter waste of police resources.

Are you kidding me? Sounds like a big time fundraiser.

39 posted on 06/02/2005 8:38:10 AM PDT by Huck (One day the lion will lay down with the lamb; Until that day comes, I want America to be the lion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
Undoubtedly the goggles were paid for by the fines they're raking in.

Or an insurance company. Geico has a history of providing "instant-on" radar guns to some police departments.

40 posted on 06/02/2005 8:38:42 AM PDT by Charles Martel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-198 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson