Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: churchillbuff

It's interesting that those who spoke out against Clinton's "war" in the Balkans weren't branded as military-hating, anti-American Milosevic sympathizers. Now that a Republican is in office, however, things are different. The people who opposed our attack on the Serbs are the same ones who say that you can't support the troops without supporting the mission. I call that hypocrisy.


95 posted on 06/03/2005 12:12:56 PM PDT by sheltonmac ("Duty is ours; consequences are God's." -Gen. Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: sheltonmac
"The people who opposed our attack on the Serbs are the same ones who say that you can't support the troops without supporting the mission."

I didn't agree with the war against the serbs, I am not saying he doesn't support our troops. I believe he just doesn't understand the threat.

It would be very diffcult to understand this war when one doesn't understand the threat.

96 posted on 06/03/2005 12:30:45 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

To: sheltonmac

"The people who opposed our attack on the Serbs are the same ones who say that you can't support the troops without supporting the mission."

Why don't you name names?

Your argument against "those people" falls flat.

Methinks the argument is that this is a war worth supporting, while Kosovo was not.

Iraq was a threat to us. Serbia wasn't.


99 posted on 06/03/2005 1:00:56 PM PDT by adam_az (It's the border, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson